IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v87y2025ics0969698925001584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How is NFT fashion distinct from digital fashion? insights from mixed-methods research combining social listening and Consumer surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Ki, Chung-Wha (Chloe)
  • Lee, HyunHwan (Aiden)
  • Lam, Magnum
  • Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi
  • Wong, Christina W.Y.

Abstract

In the Web 3.0 era, both Digital Fashion (DF) and Non-Fungible Token Fashion (NFT fashion; NF) play pivotal roles in reshaping the fashion industry. Despite sharing a digital foundation, these two entities occupy distinct roles. However, the ongoing conflation of these terms creates ambiguity regarding their specific product attributes, roles, and inherent value. This confusion is further amplified by fragmented research streams between DF and NF. The lack of comparative analysis hinders a clear understanding of each form's unique value and conceptual boundaries. To address this ambiguity, this study adopts a mixed-methods approach comprising three studies to explore how users perceive and interact with NF and DF differently, with a particular focus on NF's distinctive characteristics and its identity within the digital creative economy. Study 1 analyzed extensive Twitter data (124,615 DF-related tweets and 52,751 NF-related tweets) using social listening and Latent Dirichlet Allocation analysis, identifying six key themes for DF and nine for NF. These emergent themes, interpreted through the lens of Means-End Chain Theory, served as the foundation for the development of two survey-based research models tested in Studies 2 (DF) and 3 (NF). Study 2 (n = 201) found that DF is primarily perceived as digital content, driven by its attributes of digital renderability, visual appeal, and customizability. These characteristics encouraged consumer engagement and positively influenced purchase intent. In contrast, Study 3 (n = 203) revealed that NF is perceived as a digital asset, underpinned by its collectability, licensability, and ownability. These asset-like attributes similarly fostered engagement and purchase behaviors. Together, these findings offer a more nuanced understanding of DF and NF by revealing that—despite being rooted in the same digital foundation—consumers perceive NF as a distinct variant with unique attributes—collectability, licensability, and ownability—that position it as a digital asset rather than digital content. This perspective advances the literature by clarifying that, although NF is not mutually exclusive of DF, it clearly holds a differentiated role and distinct value within the broader digital creative economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ki, Chung-Wha (Chloe) & Lee, HyunHwan (Aiden) & Lam, Magnum & Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi & Wong, Christina W.Y., 2025. "How is NFT fashion distinct from digital fashion? insights from mixed-methods research combining social listening and Consumer surveys," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:87:y:2025:i:c:s0969698925001584
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925001584
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:87:y:2025:i:c:s0969698925001584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.