IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Job shop scheduling--A case study

Listed author(s):
  • Randolph, Paul H
Registered author(s):

    A missile range is essentially a large-scale job-shop, involving prodigious amounts of test equipment and formidable problems of coordination. Because of its characteristics, a missile range can be considered a one-machine, N-job situation. For this problem the major scheduling methods were examined and tested, but all were discarded as unfeasible except one which used a Monte Carlo scheduling procedure adjoined with statistical stopping rules. An algorithm based on these ideas was constructed, and it has proven to be flexible and workable, providing predictably near optimum schedules for the missile range within a probabilistic and statistical framework. Even though there is not total implementation yet, considerable benefits to the missile range have already been experienced. For example, in order to automate the scheduling process, it was necessary to codify the goals of the range, something that had never been formalized before. This involved an unprecedented scrutiny and precision of definition of these goals, and from this study a reasonable numerical optimization criterion was constructed. Also, in order to use any automated scheduling algorithm, data files had to be stored on tape for ready access, which in turn has improved other operations on the missile range that were dependent on these data. Furthermore, the scheduling algorithm is providing conflict-free schedules in a few minutes of computer time.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Omega.

    Volume (Year): 4 (1976)
    Issue (Month): 4 ()
    Pages: 463-477

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:4:y:1976:i:4:p:463-477
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:4:y:1976:i:4:p:463-477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.