IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v33y2005i5p431-434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A method of dissimilarity analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Alam, S.S.
  • Ghosh, S.

Abstract

This paper finds the essential differences between objects in terms of available attributes in a knowledge representation system (KR-system) where neither condition nor decision attributes are distinguished. We find these differences by using the concepts of "almost indiscernibility relation" and "approximate decision logic (ADL)" language. Here, an information system has been considered where attribute values are not always quantitative, rather subjective having vague or imprecise meanings.

Suggested Citation

  • Alam, S.S. & Ghosh, S., 2005. "A method of dissimilarity analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 431-434, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:33:y:2005:i:5:p:431-434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(04)00103-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:33:y:2005:i:5:p:431-434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.