IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formal analysis and strategic decision making


  • Langley, A


The extensive use of formal analysis in decisions has often been seen as evidence of the adoption of a "rational", comprehensive mode of strategic decision making and the rejection of social interactive and political modes of decision making. Based on a study of the role of formal analysis in strategic decisions in three organizations, this article suggests that on the contrary, formal analysis and social interactive decision processes are inextricably linked--in fact, a greater need for social interaction may cause a greater need for formal analysis. The elements of a new framework for describing the strategic decision making process and the role of formal analysis within it are proposed. This framework is based on the idea that organizational decision making is the outcome of interactions between different individuals with different levels of formal authority and expertise and different opinions and motivations. The framework is then used to identify types of situations in which formal analysis may be more or less productive. It is suggested that excessive or insufficient uses of formal analysis in decision making cannot be blamed entirely on decision participants' cognitive styles or analytical competence. Such phenomena may in fact be caused mainly by the structural features of the decision situation in which opportunities for analysis are embedded.

Suggested Citation

  • Langley, A, 1991. "Formal analysis and strategic decision making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 19(2-3), pages 79-99.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:19:y:1991:i:2-3:p:79-99

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Romanenko Olesya V., 2013. "Evolution of Scientific Approaches to Determination of Content of Strategic Analysis," Business Inform, RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE), Kharkiv National University of Economics, issue 4, pages 422-428.
    2. Franco, L. Alberto & Lord, Ewan, 2011. "Understanding multi-methodology: Evaluating the perceived impact of mixing methods for group budgetary decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 362-372, June.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:19:y:1991:i:2-3:p:79-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.