A review of information systems development methodology (ISDM) selection techniques
The arena of systems development has seen an explosion in the number of available Information systems development methodologies (ISDMs). There is no independent database that describes these ISDMs and indeed it is not even clear exactly how many of these methodologies are in existence. Different types of development situation need different methodologies, thus Information Systems (IS) practitioners are faced with a selection problem. This is clearly a management issue. The literature reports a number of methodology selection techniques. This paper reviews a cross-section of these. The authors of the paper argue that on the whole, these techniques do not adequately address the entire selection issue. From our ongoing research it is suggested that there are two facets to the problem, namely process model selection and tool selection. The techniques reviewed either attempt a blanket solution for both facets or a solution for one whilst ignoring the other. It is observed that the activity of methodology selection fits into a greater whole; a whole that continually monitors an organisation's approach to systems development, highlighting weakness and implementing improvements in an environment of evolutionary pressures similar to those confronting the organisation. The authors coin the term methodology management to refer to that activity within an organisation which is concerned with the structure and coordination of the organisation's approach to systems development. Our ongoing research is concerned with the identification and development of effective methodology management procedures.
Volume (Year): 18 (1990)
Issue (Month): 5 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description|
|Order Information:|| Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:18:y:1990:i:5:p:473-490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.