IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v137y2025ics0305048325000647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maintaining fairness in stochastic chemotherapy scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Çelik, Batuhan
  • Gul, Serhat
  • Karsu, Özlem

Abstract

Chemotherapy scheduling is hard to manage under uncertainty in infusion durations, and focusing on expected performance measure values may lead to unfavorable outcomes for some patients. In this study, we aim to design daily patient appointment schedules considering a fair environment regarding patient waiting times. We propose using a metric that encourages fairness and efficiency in waiting time allocations. To optimize this metric, we formulate a two-stage stochastic mixed-integer nonlinear programming model. We employ a binary search algorithm to identify the optimal schedule, and then propose a modified binary search algorithm (MBSA) to enhance computational capability. Moreover, to address stochastic feasibility problems at each MBSA iteration, we introduce a novel reduce-and-augment algorithm that utilizes scenario set reduction and augmentation methods. We use real data from a major oncology hospital to show the efficacy of MBSA. We compare the schedules identified by MBSA with both the baseline schedules from the oncology hospital and those generated by commonly employed scheduling heuristics. Finally, we highlight the significance of considering uncertainty in infusion durations to maintain fairness while creating appointment schedules.

Suggested Citation

  • Çelik, Batuhan & Gul, Serhat & Karsu, Özlem, 2025. "Maintaining fairness in stochastic chemotherapy scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:137:y:2025:i:c:s0305048325000647
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2025.103338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325000647
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2025.103338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:137:y:2025:i:c:s0305048325000647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.