IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v10y1982i5p525-537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model credibility and independent evaluation--Three case studies

Author

Listed:
  • Gruhl, James

Abstract

There has been a rapidly expanding use of complex models as aids to policy making. However, it has become increasingly clear that there is little understanding of the capabilities of these models, and thus their credibility and their usefulness have been greatly diminished. To help correct this situation efforts have been conducted to improve some models' usefulness through intensive independent evaluations. The state-of-the-art of the conduct of such evaluations is presented in this article by way of a review of some of the existing literature. In addition, first presented here are three case studies of in-depth model evaluations, particularly concentrating on the lessons learned with regard to the uncovering of assessment issues. A final section contains the lessons that have been learned with regard to predicting the usefulness of specific model assessments, so that the value of future assessments can be maximized through the intelligent selection of candidate models and assessment strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Gruhl, James, 1982. "Model credibility and independent evaluation--Three case studies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 525-537.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:10:y:1982:i:5:p:525-537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(82)90008-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:10:y:1982:i:5:p:525-537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.