Author
Abstract
Energy security is essential for building resilient economies and sustaining economic growth, as it directly influences productivity, competitiveness, and overall economic performance. While existing research has explored the relationship between energy security and economic development, the asymmetric effects of energy security on economic performance remain underexamined. This paper seeks to address that gap. To test the asymmetric effects of energy security, we use various energy security proxies (domestic energy production relative to consumption, energy production per capita, renewable energy share, energy intensity, and energy consumption per capita) and employ a panel dataset of 117 countries from 2000 to 2022, and apply a panel quantile estimation method. The results reveal strong heterogeneity across income levels. Energy production relative to consumption and population, and energy consumption per capita, have stronger positive effects on GDP per capita in lower quantiles, highlighting the importance of energy availability and access in the early stages of development. By contrast, the renewable energy share has a negative effect in poorer economies but turns positive in richer economies, reflecting the high costs of renewable energy adoption for low-income countries and the benefits it generates in advanced economies. Energy intensity consistently has a negative impact, but the magnitude varies nonlinearly across quantiles, underscoring the role of energy efficiency. The results are robust to alternative sample compositions excluding microstates and to an aggregate measure of energy security constructed using principal component analysis. Overall, the findings suggest that energy policy should be tailored to countries’ development levels.
Suggested Citation
Pinar, Mehmet, 2026.
"Asymmetric effect of energy security on economic performance: evidence from panel quantile regression,"
The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:joecas:v:33:y:2026:i:c:s1703494926000046
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeca.2026.e00452
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joecas:v:33:y:2026:i:c:s1703494926000046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-journal-of-economic-asymmetries/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.