IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v162y2021icp95-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thinking beyond boundaries: A growth theory of interest enhances integrative thinking that bridges the arts and sciences

Author

Listed:
  • O'Keefe, Paul A.
  • Horberg, E.J.
  • Sabherwal, Anandita
  • Ibasco, Gabrielle C.
  • Binti Zainal, Adlin

Abstract

Innovations often arise when people bridge seemingly disparate areas of knowledge, such as the arts and sciences. What leads people to make connections that others might miss? We examined the role of implicit theories of interest—the belief that interests are relatively fixed (a fixed theory of interest) or developed (a growth theory of interest) among people with established interests either in the area of arts or sciences. A stronger growth theory predicted that participants spontaneously noticed more stimuli from the area outside their interests (Studies 2 and 3) and generated better integrative ideas (Study 1). Furthermore, they were more likely to generate ideas that bridged the arts and sciences (Study 2), which was also found after inducing fixed or growth theories, establishing causality (Study 3). Finally,perceived utility of the outside area mediated this relation (Study 4). These results suggest that a growth theory may be important for integrative thinking and innovation across traditional disciplinary boundaries.

Suggested Citation

  • O'Keefe, Paul A. & Horberg, E.J. & Sabherwal, Anandita & Ibasco, Gabrielle C. & Binti Zainal, Adlin, 2021. "Thinking beyond boundaries: A growth theory of interest enhances integrative thinking that bridges the arts and sciences," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 95-108.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:162:y:2021:i:c:p:95-108
    DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.10.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597820303939
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.10.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:162:y:2021:i:c:p:95-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.