IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v101y2010i3p541-554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Likelihood ratio tests of correlated multivariate samples

Author

Listed:
  • Lim, Johan
  • Li, Erning
  • Lee, Shin-Jae

Abstract

We develop methods to compare multiple multivariate normally distributed samples which may be correlated. The methods are new in the context that no assumption is made about the correlations among the samples. Three types of null hypotheses are considered: equality of mean vectors, homogeneity of covariance matrices, and equality of both mean vectors and covariance matrices. We demonstrate that the likelihood ratio test statistics have finite-sample distributions that are functions of two independent Wishart variables and dependent on the covariance matrix of the combined multiple populations. Asymptotic calculations show that the likelihood ratio test statistics converge in distribution to central Chi-squared distributions under the null hypotheses regardless of how the populations are correlated. Following these theoretical findings, we propose a resampling procedure for the implementation of the likelihood ratio tests in which no restrictive assumption is imposed on the structures of the covariance matrices. The empirical size and power of the test procedure are investigated for various sample sizes via simulations. Two examples are provided for illustration. The results show good performance of the methods in terms of test validity and power.

Suggested Citation

  • Lim, Johan & Li, Erning & Lee, Shin-Jae, 2010. "Likelihood ratio tests of correlated multivariate samples," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 541-554, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:101:y:2010:i:3:p:541-554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-259X(09)00202-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Xinlei & Stokes, Lynne & Lim, Johan & Chen, Min, 2006. "Concomitants of Multivariate Order Statistics With Application to Judgment Poststratification," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1693-1704, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fraiman, Ricardo & Moreno, Leonardo & Ransford, Thomas, 2023. "A Cramér–Wold theorem for elliptical distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Erning Li & Johan Lim & Kyunga Kim & Shin-Jae Lee, 2012. "Distribution-free tests of mean vectors and covariance matrices for multivariate paired data," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 75(6), pages 833-854, August.
    3. Seongoh Park & Johan Lim & Xinlei Wang & Sanghan Lee, 2019. "Permutation based testing on covariance separability," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 865-883, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amirhossein Alvandi & Armin Hatefi, 2023. "Analysis of Ordinal Populations from Judgment Post-Stratification," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Omer Ozturk, 2019. "Post-stratified Probability-Proportional-to-Size Sampling from Stratified Populations," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(4), pages 693-718, December.
    3. Omer Ozturk & N. Balakrishnan, 2009. "An Exact Control-Versus-Treatment Comparison Test Based on Ranked Set Samples," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1213-1222, December.
    4. Xinlei Wang & Johan Lim & Seung-Jean Kim & Kyu Hahn, 2015. "Estimating cell probabilities in contingency tables with constraints on marginals/conditionals by geometric programming with applications," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 107-129, March.
    5. Xinlei Wang & Ke Wang & Johan Lim, 2012. "Isotonized CDF Estimation from Judgment Poststratification Data with Empty Strata," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 194-202, March.
    6. Jesse Frey & Timothy Feeman, 2013. "Variance estimation using judgment post-stratification," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(3), pages 551-569, June.
    7. Omer Ozturk, 2016. "Estimation of a Finite Population Mean and Total Using Population Ranks of Sample Units," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 181-202, March.
    8. Seongoh Park & Johan Lim & Xinlei Wang & Sanghan Lee, 2019. "Permutation based testing on covariance separability," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 865-883, June.
    9. Omer Ozturk & Olena Kravchuk, 2021. "Judgment Post-stratified Assessment Combining Ranking Information from Multiple Sources, with a Field Phenotyping Example," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(3), pages 329-348, September.
    10. Omer Ozturk, 2017. "Statistical inference with empty strata in judgment post stratified samples," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(5), pages 1029-1057, October.
    11. Omer Ozturk, 2019. "Statistical inference using rank-based post-stratified samples in a finite population," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(4), pages 1113-1143, December.
    12. Frey, Jesse & Feeman, Timothy G., 2012. "An improved mean estimator for judgment post-stratification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 418-426.
    13. Ozturk, Omer, 2014. "Statistical inference for population quantiles and variance in judgment post-stratified samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 188-205.
    14. Xinlei Wang & Johan Lim & Lynne Stokes, 2008. "A Nonparametric Mean Estimator for Judgment Poststratified Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 355-363, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:101:y:2010:i:3:p:541-554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.