IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v21y2016i1d10.1007_s13253-015-0231-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of a Finite Population Mean and Total Using Population Ranks of Sample Units

Author

Listed:
  • Omer Ozturk

    (The Ohio State University)

Abstract

This paper introduces new estimators for population total and mean in a finite population setting, where ranks (or approximate ranks) of population units are available before selecting sample units. The proposed estimators require selecting a simple random sample and identifying the population ranks of sample units. Selection of the sample can be performed with- or without-replacement. The population ranks of the selected units of with-replacement samples are determined among all population units. On the other hand, the ranks of the sample units of without-replacement samples are identified in two different ways: (1) The rank of a sample unit is determined sequentially among the remaining population units after excluding all previously ranked sample units from the population; (2) The ranks are determined among all units in the population. By conditioning on these population ranks, we construct a set of weighted estimators, develop a bootstrap re-sampling procedure to estimate the variances of the estimators, and construct percentile confidence intervals for the population mean and total. We show that the new estimators provide a substantial amount of efficiency gain over their competitors. We apply the proposed estimators to estimate corn production in one of the counties in Ohio.

Suggested Citation

  • Omer Ozturk, 2016. "Estimation of a Finite Population Mean and Total Using Population Ranks of Sample Units," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 181-202, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:21:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s13253-015-0231-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-015-0231-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-015-0231-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-015-0231-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Al-Saleh & H. Samawi, 2007. "A note on inclusion probability in ranked set sampling and some of its variations," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 198-209, May.
    2. G. Patil & A. Sinha & C. Taillie, 1995. "Finite population corrections for ranked set sampling," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 47(4), pages 621-636, December.
    3. Xinlei Wang & Johan Lim & Lynne Stokes, 2008. "A Nonparametric Mean Estimator for Judgment Poststratified Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 355-363, June.
    4. Wang, Xinlei & Stokes, Lynne & Lim, Johan & Chen, Min, 2006. "Concomitants of Multivariate Order Statistics With Application to Judgment Poststratification," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1693-1704, December.
    5. Steven N. MacEachern & Elizabeth A. Stasny & Douglas A. Wolfe, 2004. "Judgement Post-Stratification with Imprecise Rankings," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 207-215, March.
    6. Jesse Frey & Omer Ozturk, 2011. "Constrained estimation using judgment post-stratification," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 63(4), pages 769-789, August.
    7. McIntyre, G.A., 2005. "A Method for Unbiased Selective Sampling, Using Ranked Sets," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 59, pages 230-232, August.
    8. Frey, Jesse & Feeman, Timothy G., 2012. "An improved mean estimator for judgment post-stratification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 418-426.
    9. Jesse Frey & Timothy Feeman, 2013. "Variance estimation using judgment post-stratification," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(3), pages 551-569, June.
    10. Xinlei Wang & Ke Wang & Johan Lim, 2012. "Isotonized CDF Estimation from Judgment Poststratification Data with Empty Strata," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 194-202, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Omer Ozturk, 2019. "Post-stratified Probability-Proportional-to-Size Sampling from Stratified Populations," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(4), pages 693-718, December.
    2. Omer Ozturk, 2019. "Two-stage cluster samples with ranked set sampling designs," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(1), pages 63-91, February.
    3. Omer Ozturk & Olena Kravchuk, 2021. "Judgment Post-stratified Assessment Combining Ranking Information from Multiple Sources, with a Field Phenotyping Example," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(3), pages 329-348, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Omer Ozturk, 2019. "Post-stratified Probability-Proportional-to-Size Sampling from Stratified Populations," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(4), pages 693-718, December.
    2. Omer Ozturk & Olena Kravchuk, 2021. "Judgment Post-stratified Assessment Combining Ranking Information from Multiple Sources, with a Field Phenotyping Example," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(3), pages 329-348, September.
    3. Jesse Frey & Timothy Feeman, 2013. "Variance estimation using judgment post-stratification," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(3), pages 551-569, June.
    4. Omer Ozturk, 2017. "Statistical inference with empty strata in judgment post stratified samples," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(5), pages 1029-1057, October.
    5. Omer Ozturk, 2019. "Statistical inference using rank-based post-stratified samples in a finite population," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(4), pages 1113-1143, December.
    6. Ozturk, Omer, 2014. "Statistical inference for population quantiles and variance in judgment post-stratified samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 188-205.
    7. Zamanzade, Ehsan & Vock, Michael, 2015. "Variance estimation in ranked set sampling using a concomitant variable," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-5.
    8. Mozhgan Alirezaei Dizicheh & Nasrollah Iranpanah & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2021. "Bootstrap Methods for Judgment Post Stratification," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2453-2471, October.
    9. Ehsan Zamanzade & Michael Vock, 2018. "Some nonparametric tests of perfect judgment ranking for judgment post stratification," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1085-1100, September.
    10. Ali Dastbaravarde & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2020. "On estimation of $$P\left( X > Y \right) $$PX>Y based on judgement post stratification," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 767-785, April.
    11. Xinlei Wang & Johan Lim & Seung-Jean Kim & Kyu Hahn, 2015. "Estimating cell probabilities in contingency tables with constraints on marginals/conditionals by geometric programming with applications," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 107-129, March.
    12. Zamanzade, Ehsan & Wang, Xinlei, 2017. "Estimation of population proportion for judgment post-stratification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 257-269.
    13. Frey, Jesse & Feeman, Timothy G., 2012. "An improved mean estimator for judgment post-stratification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 418-426.
    14. Amirhossein Alvandi & Armin Hatefi, 2023. "Analysis of Ordinal Populations from Judgment Post-Stratification," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-27, August.
    15. Xinlei Wang & Ke Wang & Johan Lim, 2012. "Isotonized CDF Estimation from Judgment Poststratification Data with Empty Strata," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 194-202, March.
    16. Lutz Dümbgen & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2020. "Inference on a distribution function from ranked set samples," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(1), pages 157-185, February.
    17. Omer Ozturk, 2019. "Two-stage cluster samples with ranked set sampling designs," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(1), pages 63-91, February.
    18. Ozturk, Omer & Jafari Jozani, Mohammad, 2014. "Inclusion probabilities in partially rank ordered set sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 122-132.
    19. Jesse Frey & Omer Ozturk, 2011. "Constrained estimation using judgment post-stratification," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 63(4), pages 769-789, August.
    20. Matthews, Michael J. & Wolfe, Douglas A., 2017. "Unified ranked sampling," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 173-178.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:21:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s13253-015-0231-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.