IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jhecon/v106y2026ics0167629626000202.html

Shared Stakes in English General Practice: The Impact of Practice Managers as Partners on Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Urwin, Sean
  • Walker, Ben
  • Anderson, Michael

Abstract

Ownership of English general practices by physicians has been declining for many years and concentrated among fewer physicians. Non-clinical ownership may provide a sustainable alternative structure for general practice. In this study, we provide the first formal evaluation of non-clinical ownership in an English general practice setting. We compile a comprehensive dataset of general practices across eight years between 2015/16 and 2022/23 from a range of sources to investigate the impact of non-clinical ownership stakes on key primary care outcomes, including staffing levels and turnover, patient satisfaction, access, quality of care, reimbursement for non-core services and total patient list size. Employing a dynamic event study design combined with propensity-score weighting, we find practice manager partners increase direct patient care (excluding physicians and nurses), administrative staff numbers, reimbursement for non-core services and total patient list size. However, we find no statistically significant effect on any other outcome. Offering equity stakes to non-physician staff may support practice sustainability by allowing alternative ownership structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Urwin, Sean & Walker, Ben & Anderson, Michael, 2026. "Shared Stakes in English General Practice: The Impact of Practice Managers as Partners on Outcomes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:106:y:2026:i:c:s0167629626000202
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2026.103122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629626000202
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2026.103122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:106:y:2026:i:c:s0167629626000202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505560 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.