Author
Listed:
- Si, Ruishi
- Zhao, Hao
- Pan, Sitong
- Tan, Yongfeng
- Liu, Mingyue
Abstract
Mitigating antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in veterinary medicine is critical to achieving the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Most countries have adopted tailored antimicrobial reduction policies in animal production, yet rigorous cost-benefit evaluations remain scarce. We leverage China’s large-scale 2021 veterinary antimicrobial use reduction (AUR) policies as a quasi-natural experiment, employing a Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity (FRD) design to estimate its causal effects on farmers’ net income and disentangle the transmission mechanisms using three-wave panel data from hog farmers (2022–2024). The empirical results demonstrate that the AUR policies exhibited a dynamic pattern of initial income suppression followed by income enhancement, with the estimated effect turning positive in the second year of implementation (2023). Based on the baseline FRD estimates, the average effect over the full panel period is an increase of 186.504–198.708 CNY per head, representing 34.09 %–36.32 % of the three-year average net income. This effect is primarily driven by changes in cost-benefit indicators such as slaughter weight, market premiums, biosecurity expenditures, antimicrobial input costs, and antimicrobial alternative costs. We elucidate the underlying mechanisms through which AUR policy interventions operate, specifically via antimicrobial use regulation, compulsory immunization, antimicrobial-reduction compliance certification, and antimicrobial-reduction technical training. During the AUR’s initial rollout (2022), antimicrobial use regulation was the primary income suppressor, whereas market premiums became the dominant income driver in the maturation phase (2023–2024). Moreover, heterogeneity analysis shows that the income-enhancing effect of the AUR policies was more pronounced among farmers who possessed high digital literacy and had organizational support, compared to those without these advantages. Based onChina’s AUR experience, weproposefive policy insightsthat are particularly relevant fordeveloping-country contexts: optimized policy mixes, tiered biosecurity systems, scalable antimicrobial alternatives, targeted market incentives, and inclusive global governance frameworks.
Suggested Citation
Si, Ruishi & Zhao, Hao & Pan, Sitong & Tan, Yongfeng & Liu, Mingyue, 2026.
"Assessing the economic effects of veterinary antimicrobial use reduction policies: China’s experience and worldwide implications,"
Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:142:y:2026:i:c:s0306919226001065
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2026.103139
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:142:y:2026:i:c:s0306919226001065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodpol .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.