IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfpoli/v142y2026ics030691922600103x.html

Predictable patterns of protest: The impact of agricultural cycles on social unrest in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Robiro, Nicole
  • Seelos, Sophia

Abstract

This paper investigates how the agricultural cycle influences protest behavior in Kenya from 2000 to 2019. Using satellite data to identify the crop cycle and local harvest periods at the lowest available administrative level (wards) and geocoded protest records, we find that protest activity does not decline during the harvest period but increases with a temporal lag. A dynamic difference-in-differences specification shows that protest activity gradually rises in the two to three months following harvest, peaking around the onset of the subsequent agricultural cycle. These patterns are consistent with theories of opportunity costs and seasonal scarcity. While the opportunity costs of protest participation are highest during harvest periods, they decline thereafter and coincide with the lean season, when household food stocks become exhausted. These findings are robust across empirical specifications and contribute to a deeper understanding of the temporal dynamics of unrest in agrarian settings. They also highlight the importance of timing in the design of rural development and conflict prevention policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Robiro, Nicole & Seelos, Sophia, 2026. "Predictable patterns of protest: The impact of agricultural cycles on social unrest in Kenya," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:142:y:2026:i:c:s030691922600103x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2026.103136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030691922600103X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.foodpol.2026.103136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:142:y:2026:i:c:s030691922600103x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.