Author
Listed:
- Li, Junjie
- Li, Jianping
- Xiao, Qin
- Wu, Haixia
- Liu, Di
Abstract
This study examines not only whether paddy procurement channels are associated with price differences in China, but also which farmers are able to capture the gains from the premium channel. Using farm-level panel data, we classify farmers’ paddy sales into four procurement-channel categories: the intermediary channel, the milling channel, the grain depot channel, and multi-channel sales. We estimate net farm-gate paddy price differentials using household fixed-effects models, assess heterogeneity by farm size, rice-income dependence, and adoption of high-quality varieties, and analyze access to the empirically identified premium channel using binary logit and fixed-effects linear probability models. We find that only the milling channel is consistently associated with a price premium. In the baseline specification, selling through the milling channel is associated with net farm-gate paddy prices about 4.5% higher than those received through the intermediary channel. The premium is larger for large-scale farmers, households less reliant on rice income, and growers of high-quality varieties. Medium-scale farmers emerge as the “missing middle”: they are less likely to access the premium channel and least likely to move into it over time. Access to formal market information is robustly associated with premium-channel access, while storage capacity strengthens the price premium associated with the milling channel. Overall, the results suggest that the gains from procurement-channel upgrading are unevenly distributed and depend crucially on who can reach the premium channel and convert that access into realized price gains.
Suggested Citation
Li, Junjie & Li, Jianping & Xiao, Qin & Wu, Haixia & Liu, Di, 2026.
"Premium procurement channel access and farm-gate prices: evidence from rice farmers in China,"
Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:142:y:2026:i:c:s0306919226000990
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2026.103132
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:142:y:2026:i:c:s0306919226000990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodpol .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.