IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeeman/v138y2026ics0095069626000768.html

Evaluating the effectiveness of mobile emission standards: Evidence from California’s LEV program

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao, Yuxian

Abstract

While mobile-source emission standards have been widely implemented for decades, their effectiveness remains underexplored. This paper evaluates the impact of California’s Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) program on ambient air pollution by exploiting its staggered adoption across states. Using a large panel of monitor-day observations from 1985–2014 matched with daily weather data, I employ a modern staggered difference-in-differences framework to compare air-pollution trends in LEV and never-LEV states. The event-study results show no evidence of pre-trends and reveal a gradual build-up of treatment effects over roughly a decade after adoption. On average over the sample period, the LEV program reduces daily maximum ozone concentrations by 4.78%. The program’s impact is more pronounced during summer months and in urban and suburban regions, and these patterns are robust to restricting the sample to long-running monitors, excluding border monitors, and reweighting the data using a synthetic-control difference-in-differences procedure. These findings provide empirical evidence on the effectiveness of vehicle-emission standards and contribute to the broader literature on environmental regulation and mobile-source pollution control.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao, Yuxian, 2026. "Evaluating the effectiveness of mobile emission standards: Evidence from California’s LEV program," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:138:y:2026:i:c:s0095069626000768
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2026.103356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069626000768
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jeem.2026.103356?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:138:y:2026:i:c:s0095069626000768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622870 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.