IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeborg/v247y2026ics0167268126001654.html

Fair inequality? Lab evidence from Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Bjorvatn, Kjetil
  • Coniglio, Nicola D.
  • Nasgowitz, Arne

Abstract

Attitudes to inequality differ across countries and contexts, and understanding these differences is important for the design of redistributive policies. We here present evidence on fairness preferences in Kenya, based on a series of lab experiments with participants from Nairobi’s largest informal settlement and its main university. This innovative sample allows us to compare the attitudes and beliefs of two important groups in society: the poor and the educated. We find that while the participants from the informal settlements are more egalitarian than the university students, they are less egalitarian than what is generally perceived. A second important finding is the sharp distinction made between distribution and redistribution, where participants are far more willing to equalize funds with no clear entitlement compared to funds where there is an ex-ante allocation. Finally, many participants view luck as a more deserving source of inequality than performance, an observation that is contrary to what is commonly found in the literature. Our results highlight the complexity of people’s fairness views and show the importance of not relying on stereotypes when designing redistributive policies that harmonize with local norms.

Suggested Citation

  • Bjorvatn, Kjetil & Coniglio, Nicola D. & Nasgowitz, Arne, 2026. "Fair inequality? Lab evidence from Kenya," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:247:y:2026:i:c:s0167268126001654
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2026.107579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268126001654
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jebo.2026.107579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:247:y:2026:i:c:s0167268126001654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jebo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.