IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v99y2025ics0047235225001163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adolescent sexual offending: A comparison of female and male adolescents on the ERASOR, and background and offense characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Clift, Robert J.W.

Abstract

A sample of 58 female adolescents who have committed sexual offenses (ASOs) was compared with an existing sample of 618 male ASOs. Female and male ASOs were compared on offense characteristics, background characteristics, and ERASOR scores. The convergent validity of the ERASOR was also examined. All female ASOs either initiated or co-initiated their sexual offense(s). However, raters often disagreed about female ASOs' motivations for offending. The modal victim of both female and male ASOs was a female child between the ages of six and 11. Compared with male ASOs, female ASOs were significantly more likely to have been sexually abused, and to have a range of mental health concerns. Female ASOs were significantly less likely to have used violence during their sexual offenses. Although female and male ASOs had similar mean Total Scores on the ERASOR, modified versions of the ERASOR were only able to distinguish ASOs with one victim from ASOs with multiple victims in the male sample. Based on the limited existing literature, the ERASOR is not currently recommended for use with female ASOs.

Suggested Citation

  • Clift, Robert J.W., 2025. "Adolescent sexual offending: A comparison of female and male adolescents on the ERASOR, and background and offense characteristics," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001163
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001163
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.