IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v99y2025ics004723522500100x.html

Reading the mind in the dark: Theory of mind and dark personality as predictors of criminal behavior and recidivism

Author

Listed:
  • Opriș, Laura
  • Hurezan, Liliana
  • Visu-Petra, Laura

Abstract

Are inherently self-focused individuals with pronounced dark personality traits (in)capable of understanding other minds? How does this predict their criminal behavior and reoffending risk? Both aversive personality traits and mentalization deficits have been documented to predict criminal behavior, although their joint contribution has not yet been explored. We evaluated the core of dark personality with the Dark Factor of Personality (Moshagen et al., 2018), extracting its Dark themes (Callousness, Sadism, Vindictiveness, Deceitfulness, and Narcissistic Entitlement) as reported by a sample of convicted offenders (N = 173) and a matched community sample (N = 88). Participants were tested with a set of four performance-based theory of mind tasks (ToM: first, second-order, and advanced). While basic ToM abilities were similar across groups, recidivists showed impairments in advanced ToM, particularly in decoding intentionality, a deficit which did not differ according to offense type. A predictive model revealed that a combination of elevated levels of Sadism, lower ability to decode Intentionality, alongside reduced social desirability, were the most significant predictors of recidivism. Implications of these findings for developing rehabilitation programs which take into account both (dark) personality propensities and mentalization deficits to prevent reoffending are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Opriș, Laura & Hurezan, Liliana & Visu-Petra, Laura, 2025. "Reading the mind in the dark: Theory of mind and dark personality as predictors of criminal behavior and recidivism," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s004723522500100x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004723522500100X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorena Maneiro & María Patricia Navas & Mitch Van Geel & Olalla Cutrín & Paul Vedder, 2020. "Dark Triad Traits and Risky Behaviours: Identifying Risk Profiles from a Person-Centred Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Simon Gachter & Ernst Fehr, 2000. "Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(4), pages 980-994, September.
    3. Bonfá-Araujo, Bruno & Ferreira, Leonardo Borges & Jesuíno, Ana Deyvis Santos Araújo & Hauck-Filho, Nelson & Iglesias, Fabio, 2023. "Measuring the dark core: A Brazilian adaptation and comparison between the general population and incarcerated men," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Flexon, Jamie L. & Meldrum, Ryan C. & Young, Jacob T.N. & Lehmann, Peter S., 2016. "Low self-control and the Dark Triad: Disentangling the predictive power of personality traits on young adult substance use, offending and victimization," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 159-169.
    5. Jon Hendricks & Stephen J. Cutler, 2004. "Volunteerism and Socioemotional Selectivity in Later Life," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 59(5), pages 251-257.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Makowsky, Michael D. & Wang, Siyu, 2018. "Embezzlement, whistleblowing, and organizational architecture: An experimental investigation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 58-75.
    2. Mengyuan Zhou, 2022. "Does the Source of Inheritance Matter in Bequest Attitudes? Evidence from Japan," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 867-887, December.
    3. Bereket Kebede & Daniel John Zizzo, 2011. "Envy and Agricultural Innovation: An Experimental Case Study from Ethiopia," CSAE Working Paper Series 2011-06, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    4. Kyung Hwan Baik & Subhasish M. Chowdhury & Abhijit Ramalingam, 2021. "Group size and matching protocol in contests," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 1716-1736, November.
    5. Christoph Engel & Michael Kurschilgen, 2011. "Fairness Ex Ante and Ex Post: Experimentally Testing Ex Post Judicial Intervention into Blockbuster Deals," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(4), pages 682-708, December.
    6. Markus C. Arnold & Eva Ponick, 2006. "Kommunikation im Groves-Mechanismus — Ergebnisse eines Laborexperiments," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 89-120, February.
    7. Kamei, Kenju, 2016. "Information Disclosure and Cooperation in a Finitely-repeated Dilemma: Experimental Evidence," MPRA Paper 75100, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Christian Thöni, 2014. "Inequality aversion and antisocial punishment," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 529-545, April.
    9. Decker, Torsten & Stiehler, Andreas & Strobel, Martin, 2002. "A Comparison of Punishment Rules in Repeated Public Good Games - An Experimental Study," Research Memorandum 020, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    10. repec:rza:wpaper:227 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Pierre Koning & J. Vyrastekova & S. Onderstal, 2006. "Team incentives in public organisations; an experimental study," CPB Discussion Paper 60, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    12. Ingela Alger & Jörgen W. Weibull, 2013. "Homo Moralis—Preference Evolution Under Incomplete Information and Assortative Matching," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(6), pages 2269-2302, November.
    13. Gonzalo Olcina & Vicente Calabuig, 2015. "Coordinated Punishment and the Evolution of Cooperation," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 17(2), pages 147-173, April.
    14. Angelsen, Arild & Naime, Julia, 2024. "The mixed impacts of peer punishments on common-pool resources: Multi-country experimental evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    15. Judith Kas & David J. Hardisty & Michel J. J. Handgraaf, 2021. "Steady steps versus sudden shifts: Cooperation in (a)symmetric linear and step-level social dilemmas," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(1), pages 142-164, January.
    16. Bašić, Zvonimir & Bindra, Parampreet C. & Glätzle-Rützler, Daniela & Romano, Angelo & Sutter, Matthias & Zoller, Claudia, 2021. "The Roots of Cooperation," IZA Discussion Papers 14467, IZA Network @ LISER.
    17. Elena Cettolin & Arno Riedl, 2011. "Partial Coercion, Conditional Cooperation, and Self-Commitment in Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods," CESifo Working Paper Series 3556, CESifo.
    18. van der Heijden, Eline & Potters, Jan & Sefton, Martin, 2009. "Hierarchy and opportunism in teams," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 39-50, January.
    19. Mengyuan Zhou, 2019. "The Effect of the Source of Inheritance on Bequest Attitudes: Evidence from Japan," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2019-018, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    20. Ghidoni, Riccardo & Suetens, Sigrid, 2019. "Empirical Evidence on Repeated Sequential Games," Other publications TiSEM ff3a441f-e196-4e45-ba59-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    21. M. Bigoni & D. Dragone, 2011. "An experiment on experimental instructions," Working Papers wp794, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s004723522500100x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.