IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v99y2025ics0047235225000807.html

Exploring corporate violations through public data: A comparative analysis of financial offending in the UK and US

Author

Listed:
  • Oberheim, Frederike
  • Davies, Jon
  • Giese, Celine
  • Kluin, Marieke
  • Lord, Nicholas

Abstract

This article examines the value of using publicly available data to analyse financial violations and regulatory enforcement actions in the UK and the US, drawing on a first-of-its-kind open-source dataset – the Violation Tracker. Through descriptive analyses, the study explores longitudinal patterns of corporate offending, focusing on corporate characteristics and sectoral enforcement dynamics. The findings highlight jurisdictional differences: in the UK, anti-money laundering (AML) deficiencies and tax violations dominate, with a notable increase in AML deficiencies since 2020, particularly in real estate and business services. In contrast, the US landscape is characterized by widespread investor protection violations, particularly in the financial industry, and exhibit stable trends over time. In both countries, the financial industry receives high penalties compared to other industries. These patterns underscore the role of regulatory frameworks and enforcement priorities in shaping observable corporate compliance. This study illustrates what insights can and cannot be generated from open-source data for the analysis of financial violations. It also engages with theoretical frameworks such as life-course criminology, advancing the understanding of corporate crime trajectories over time. The research contributes to current debates on regulatory transparency, corporate accountability, and the methodological challenges of conducting robust empirical research using publicly available regulatory data.

Suggested Citation

  • Oberheim, Frederike & Davies, Jon & Giese, Celine & Kluin, Marieke & Lord, Nicholas, 2025. "Exploring corporate violations through public data: A comparative analysis of financial offending in the UK and US," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000807
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000807
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aneesh Raghunandan, 2021. "Financial misconduct and employee mistreatment: Evidence from wage theft," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 867-905, September.
    2. PeterJ May & Søren Winter, 1999. "Regulatory enforcement and compliance: Examining Danish agro-environmental policy," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(4), pages 625-651.
    3. Ashton, John & Burnett, Tim & Diaz-Rainey, Ivan & Ormosi, Peter, 2021. "Known unknowns: How much financial misconduct is detected and deterred?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Donato Masciandaro & Marc Quintyn, 2016. "The Governance Of Financial Supervision: Recent Developments," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 982-1006, December.
    5. Cihák, Martin & Podpiera, Richard, 2008. "Integrated financial supervision: Which model?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 135-152, August.
    6. Raghunandan, Aneesh, 2021. "Financial misconduct and employee mistreatment: evidence from wage theft," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109863, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Andrew Hindmoor & Allan McConnell, 2013. "Why Didn't They See it Coming? Warning Signs, Acceptable Risks and the Global Financial Crisis," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 61(3), pages 543-560, October.
    8. Neukirchen, Daniel & Köchling, Gerrit & Posch, Peter N., 2023. "Enforcement of corporate misconduct during Democratic and Republican administrations," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    9. Leyla Orudzheva & Manjula S. Salimath & Robert Pavur, 2020. "Vortex of Corruption: Longitudinal Analysis of Normative Pressures in Top Global Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 529-551, May.
    10. Eugene Soltes, 2019. "The frequency of corporate misconduct: public enforcement versus private reality," Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(4), pages 923-937, October.
    11. Anton Shevchenko, 2021. "Do financial penalties for environmental violations facilitate improvements in corporate environmental performance? An empirical investigation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1723-1734, May.
    12. Heese, Jonas & Pérez-Cavazos, Gerardo & Peter, Caspar David, 2022. "When the local newspaper leaves town: The effects of local newspaper closures on corporate misconduct," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 445-463.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darendeli, Alper & Fiechter, Peter & Hitz, Jörg-Markus & Lehmann, Nico, 2022. "The role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) information in supply-chain contracting: Evidence from the expansion of CSR rating coverage," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(2).
    2. Marco Meyer & Tong Li, 2025. "Can Good Information Prevent Misconduct? The Role of Organizational Epistemic Virtues for Ethical Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(3), pages 489-504, March.
    3. J. Daniel Zyung, 2025. "Expectations and Exits: The Effect of CEO Agency and Communion on Boards’ Expectancy Violations and Dismissal of CEOs Following Breaches of Stakeholder Rights," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 2372-2398, November.
    4. Attig, Najah & El Ghoul, Sadok & Hossain, Ashrafee, 2026. "Stakeholder-centric corporate misconduct and financing policies: A precautionary tale," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    5. Islam, Emdad & Loriot, Blake & Rahman, Lubna, 2025. "The impact of product market competition on workplace safety," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Mehrzad B. Baktash & Uwe Jirjahn, 2026. "Up to the Top or Stuck in the Middle: Does Gender Influence How Far Machiavellian Personalities Climb the Corporate Ladder?," Research Papers in Economics 2026-03, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    7. Duong, Huu Nhan & Khalifa, Mariem & Sheikhbahaei, Ali & Sualihu, Mohammed Aminu, 2024. "Corporate noncompliance: Do corporate violations affect bank loan contracting?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    8. Mehrzad B. Baktash & Uwe Jirjahn, 2026. "Are Managers More Machiavellian Than Other Employees?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 79(3), pages 379-407, May.
    9. Albrecht, Disen Huang & Anantharaman, Divya & Zhao, Keyi, 2025. "Is a picture worth a thousand words? Image usage in ESG reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    10. Dhruv Chand Aggarwal, 2023. "The market for general counsel," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 895-940, December.
    11. Aneesh Raghunandan, 2024. "Government Subsidies and Corporate Misconduct," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 62(4), pages 1449-1496, September.
    12. Walaa Wahid ElKelish*, 2023. "Accounting for Corporate Human Rights: Literature Review and Future Insights," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(2), pages 203-226, June.
    13. Marco Meyer & Chun Wei Choo, 2024. "Harming by Deceit: Epistemic Malevolence and Organizational Wrongdoing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 439-452, January.
    14. Christopher Dupuis & Ying Zheng, 2024. "Import Penetration and Corporate Misconduct: A Natural Experiment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 475-506, December.
    15. Sarker, Md Showaib Rahman & Mazumder, Sharif & Amin, Md Ruhul, 2023. "Oil price uncertainty, workplace misconduct, and cash holding," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Xiaoyi Lyu & Chenyu Shan & Dragon Yongjun Tang, 2025. "Does Traditional Debt Financing Hurt the Environment? Evidence from Toxic Releases," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(4), pages 957-985, September.
    17. Yang, Yiye & Li, Xiaohong & Zhang, Qihao & Zhang, Pengdong, 2025. "The externalities of managerial myopia: Aspiration performance gap and film quality in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    18. Unsal, Omer, 2023. "Corporate crimes and innovation: Evidence from US financial firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    19. Megginson, William L. & Park, Hyeonjoon, 2025. "The impact of enhanced creditor rights on venture capital: Evidence from the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    20. Jake Thomas & Wentao Yao & Frank Zhang & Wei Zhu, 2022. "Meet, beat, and pollute," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 1038-1078, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.