IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v98y2025ics0047235225000583.html

Beware the truth effect: Why efforts to debunk rape myths may backfire

Author

Listed:
  • Krahé, Barbara

Abstract

Rape myths, defined as statements about sexual assault that trivialize sexual assault and denigrate victims, have been identified as risk factors for primary and secondary victimization and obstacles to the fair processing of sexual assault cases in the criminal justice system. To dispel rape myths, a widely used strategy in public information campaigns as well as jury instructions is the “myths vs. facts” (MvsF) approach in which rape myths are first presented and then contradicted by alternative factual information. This approach has high face validity, but it has not been subjected to systematic evaluation. This paper reviews evidence from social cognition and communication science on the “truth effect” which indicates that presenting myths prior to refuting them may be counterproductive because they may be misremembered as facts and used to evaluate sexual assault cases, thereby strengthening rather than reducing the acceptance of rape myths. Both motivational and cognitive processes explaining the truth effect are presented. Strategies for avoiding the truth effect and alternative approaches for dispelling rape myths as well as directions for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Krahé, Barbara, 2025. "Beware the truth effect: Why efforts to debunk rape myths may backfire," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000583
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000583
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lena Nadarevic & Martin Schnuerch & Marlena J. Stegemann, 2021. "Judging fast and slow: The truth effect does not increase under time-pressure conditions," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(5), pages 1234-1266, September.
    2. Pantazi, Myrto & Klein, Olivier & Kissine, Mikhail, 2020. "Is justice blind or myopic? An examination of the effects of meta-cognitive myopia and truth bias on mock jurors and judges," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 214-229, March.
    3. Myrto Pantazi & Olivier Klein & Mikhail Kissine, 2020. "Is justice blind or myopic? An examination of the effects of meta-cognitive myopia and truth bias on mock jurors and judges," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(2), pages 214-229, March.
    4. Nadarevic, Lena & Schnuerch, Martin & Stegemann, Marlena J., 2021. "Judging fast and slow: The truth effect does not increase under time-pressure conditions," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(5), pages 1234-1266, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Walters, Jared & Nguyen, Lan & Liu, Yixuan & Ijurco, Shay Monreal & Evans, Skhye & Chacos, Noah & Duran, Mathew & Smith, Christine, 2025. "Justice without bias: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions aimed at reducing jury bias in Rape and sexual assault trials," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steeven Ye & David Attali & Maria Ghazi & Arnaud Cachia & Mathieu Cassotti & Grégoire Borst, 2026. "Systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for an illusory truth effect and its determinants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.