IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v19y1991i1p49-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The risk of recidivism: Evaluating the public-safety implications of a community corrections program

Author

Listed:
  • Jones, Peter R.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jones, Peter R., 1991. "The risk of recidivism: Evaluating the public-safety implications of a community corrections program," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 49-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:19:y:1991:i:1:p:49-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0047-2352(91)90082-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrice Villettaz & Martin Killias & Isabel Zoder, 2006. "The Effects of Custodial vs. Non‐Custodial Sentences on Re‐Offending: A Systematic Review of the State of Knowledge," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), pages 1-69.
    2. Petrich, Damon M. & Pratt, Travis C. & Jonson, Cheryl Lero & Cullen, Francis T., 2020. "A Revolving Door? A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Custodial Sanctions on Reoffending," SocArXiv f6uwm, Center for Open Science.
    3. Worrall, John L. & Schram, Pamela & Hays, Eric & Newman, Matthew, 2004. "An analysis of the relationship between probation caseloads and property crime rates in California counties," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 231-241.
    4. Robert John Zagar & Steve Variela & Kenneth G. Busch & James Garbarino & Agata Karolina Zagar & Joseph W. Kovach & Steve Tippins & John Russell Hughes & Ishup Singh, 2019. "Implications of Machine-Learning, Internet-Tests to Save Lives and Money: "7-Point Violence Profile:" Review of 212 Studies, 320,051 Persons, Over 95 Years, With a Cross-Validation Among 136," Review of European Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 106-106, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:19:y:1991:i:1:p:49-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.