IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v103y2026ics0047235226000188.html

Racial attitudes and public perceptions of police reform: An empirical analysis informed by racial threat theory

Author

Listed:
  • Bussey, P. Trey
  • Dunlap, Brenna
  • Butler, Leah C.

Abstract

Building from racial threat theory, scholars have tested whether racial attitudes are associated with views on policing, with findings generally suggesting they are. However, the link between racial attitudes and beliefs about recently proposed policing reforms has not been fully examined. Using data from a 2023 YouGov survey of a national sample of U.S. adults (N = 1299), we analyze support for reforms targeting officer behavior, agency policy, and police abolition. Analyses assess how three racial attitudes—racial resentment, racial sympathy, and White nationalism—are related to these opinions. The findings reveal that officer-level reforms received strong support, whereas support for agency-level initiatives was more limited. Abolition received minimal endorsement. Black respondents expressed greater support for nearly all reforms than other racial groups. Multivariate analyses show that support for the three reform types are significantly associated with racial attitudes and other respondent characteristics. These findings suggest that the public may be more amenable to criminal justice reforms that aim to deter individual practitioners from bad practices than they are to sweeping systemic changes. The popularity of the bad-actor-targeted reforms may be driven less by racial attitudes than other policies are, though further research is needed to identify/falsify theorized causal relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Bussey, P. Trey & Dunlap, Brenna & Butler, Leah C., 2026. "Racial attitudes and public perceptions of police reform: An empirical analysis informed by racial threat theory," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:103:y:2026:i:c:s0047235226000188
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2026.102611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235226000188
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2026.102611?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:103:y:2026:i:c:s0047235226000188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.