IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v102y2026ics0047235225002302.html

Police bias units and hate crime reporting: Insights from the geocoded version of the National Crime Victimization Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Piatkowska, Sylwia J.
  • Lantz, Brendan
  • Mills, Jack M.

Abstract

This study examines the role of police bias units as a factor in hate crime reporting. We use a series of survey logistic regression models to analyze a restricted version of the National Crime Victimization Survey, which we merge with data on the presence of police bias units. The results indicate that the greater presence of police bias units is positively associated with an increased likelihood of hate crime reporting. Notably, with an initial increase in police bias units, hate crime victimization aligns more closely with official hate crime statistics. The effect of police bias units is also conditioned by community characteristics. These findings carry important policy implications, underscoring the vital role of police bias units in enhancing hate crime reporting and identifying communities where their effects are most pronounced.

Suggested Citation

  • Piatkowska, Sylwia J. & Lantz, Brendan & Mills, Jack M., 2026. "Police bias units and hate crime reporting: Insights from the geocoded version of the National Crime Victimization Survey," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:102:y:2026:i:c:s0047235225002302
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225002302
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Min Xie & Janet L. Lauritsen, 2012. "Racial Context and Crime Reporting: A Test of Black’s Stratification Hypothesis," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 265-293, June.
    2. Mark T. Berg & Janet L. Lauritsen, 2016. "Telling a Similar Story Twice? NCVS/UCR Convergence in Serious Violent Crime Rates in Rural, Suburban, and Urban Places (1973–2010)," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 61-87, March.
    3. Vanden Bosch, Matthew & Lantz, Brendan, 2025. "Differential compliance with the reporting of hate crime statistics as a function of state laws," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Brendan Lantz & Marin R. Wenger & Jack M. Mills, 2024. "The individual impacts of hate crime victimization," Chapters, in: James Hawdon & Matthew Costello (ed.), Research Handbook on Hate and Hate Crimes in Society, chapter 4, pages 59-81, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Willemijn E. Bezemer & Marise Ph. Born & Arjen S. Leerkes, 2024. "Addressing Ethnic Differences in the Validity of Self-reported Criminal Behaviour Through a Social Desirability Measure," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 257-284, June.
    2. Jose Pina-Sánchez & David Buil-Gil & Ian Brunton-Smith & Alexandru Cernat, 2023. "The Impact of Measurement Error in Regression Models Using Police Recorded Crime Rates," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 975-1002, December.
    3. Lee Ann Slocum, 2018. "The Effect of Prior Police Contact on Victimization Reporting: Results from the Police–Public Contact and National Crime Victimization Surveys," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 535-589, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:102:y:2026:i:c:s0047235225002302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.