IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v100y2025ics0047235225001321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voices from inside focused deterrence: Implications for implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Kochel, Tammy Rinehart
  • McGarrell, Edmund F.

Abstract

Rigorous evidence supports that focused deterrence strategies implemented with fidelity reduce homicide and gang-involved gun violence. This study seeks to apply implementation science to improve focused deterrence implementation. Interviews with eighteen focused deterrence participants are used to unpack how a sample of gang-involved youth/young adults view and experience gangs and guns, interpret and react to the call-in meeting and message, their motives for change, and stated needs to create and sustain change. The study scrutinizes participants' experiences with specific and general deterrence. Most participants understood the focused deterrence message and felt motivated to avoid elevated penalties, albeit 23 % reoffended with a gun post-call-in and half experienced the lever-pull of incarceration. Nearly half of interviewees conveyed the focused deterrence message to gang or gun-involved peers. An important theme was the role of family in both facilitating and eschewing gang involvement. Notable recommendations for implementation include building social networks into focused deterrence to combat isolation, connecting mentors and participants at the call-in, and incorporating multi-systemic therapy and a holistic family approach. A documented history of escalating delinquency and gun violence victimization reveals the potential for hospital-based violence prevention. Lessons learned provide support for conducting participant interviews to inform focused deterrence implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kochel, Tammy Rinehart & McGarrell, Edmund F., 2025. "Voices from inside focused deterrence: Implications for implementation," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001321
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001321
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.