IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v215y2026ics0148296326003462.html

How decision failures shape escalation of commitment: the role of regret and regulatory focus

Author

Listed:
  • Nickel, Julian
  • Schuhmacher, Monika C.
  • Kuester, Sabine

Abstract

We investigate how a prior decision failure affects escalation of commitment in subsequent new product development. Distinguishing between commission errors (persisting with failing projects) and omission errors (prematurely abandoning promising projects), we demonstrate their distinct effects on subsequent escalation of commitment across two experimental studies with innovation managers. Study 1 tests the main effect, and Study 2 examines the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions. Drawing on regret regulation theory and regulatory focus theory, we show that anticipated keep regret, arising from continuing a failing project, and anticipated drop regret, stemming from terminating a promising project too soon, conditionally mediate these effects, depending on decision-makers’ regulatory focus. Commission errors increase anticipated keep regret, reducing escalation among decision-makers low in prevention focus, whereas omission errors heighten anticipated drop regret, increasing escalation among those high in promotion focus.

Suggested Citation

  • Nickel, Julian & Schuhmacher, Monika C. & Kuester, Sabine, 2026. "How decision failures shape escalation of commitment: the role of regret and regulatory focus," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:215:y:2026:i:c:s0148296326003462
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296326003462
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:215:y:2026:i:c:s0148296326003462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.