IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v212y2026ics0148296326002663.html

Too hard to imagine: material versus experiential product preference while seeking happiness

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Aekyoung

Abstract

The current research examines that happiness-seeking (vs. no happiness-seeking) increases preference for material products, but not for experiential products. This research tests that imagination of product consumption underlies this effect via mediation analysis (Studies 3 and 6). This research also shows that the proposed effect is mitigated when imagination is directly guided (Study 4) and when imagination cues relevant to the target products are present (Study 5). This research also identifies several important boundary conditions that can impair consumers’ imagination. Consistent with the theorizing, the proposed effect is mitigated when material products involve unfamiliar, innovative aspects (Study 6) and when imagination capacity is low (Study 7). This research contributes to the literature on happiness, imagination, materialism, and consumer behavior. This research also offers useful insights into how to adjust consumers’ product preferences by altering their imagination of product consumption while seeking happiness during purchase decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Aekyoung, 2026. "Too hard to imagine: material versus experiential product preference while seeking happiness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s0148296326002663
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296326002663
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s0148296326002663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.