IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v210y2026ics0148296326002055.html

The impact of power distance belief and relative status on service evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Ellen E.K.
  • Lee, Seung Hyun Jenna
  • Seo, Kwanglim

Abstract

While existing research has examined how the consumer’s power distance belief (PDB) shapes service perceptions, the role of the consumer’s relative status—shaped by reference points such as service providers and other customers—and its interplay with PDB remains largely unexplored. Through three studies, this paper examines how PDB moderates the relationship between relative status and service evaluations, particularly in service failure and recovery contexts. Study 1 demonstrates that PDB amplifies the effect of customer-provider status differences on service satisfaction, with stronger effects for individuals with higher PDB. Study 2 highlights how status, PDB, and compensation type jointly influence service recovery evaluations. Study 3 identifies perceived power as a critical mechanism linking status to entitlement and service recovery expectations, particularly among high-PDB individuals. This research advances understanding of how relative status and PDB jointly shape service evaluations and offers practical guidance for managing customer service interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Ellen E.K. & Lee, Seung Hyun Jenna & Seo, Kwanglim, 2026. "The impact of power distance belief and relative status on service evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0148296326002055
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296326002055
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0148296326002055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.