IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v210y2026ics0148296326001815.html

Corporate sociopolitical activism as a Signal: A Meta-Analysis and research agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Braga, Luiza D.
  • Tardin, Matheus G.
  • Grinstein, Amir
  • Perin, Marcelo G.

Abstract

Corporations are increasingly taking public stances on divisive sociopolitical issues. Yet research offers conflicting evidence on whether Corporate Sociopolitical Activism (CSA) leads to more favorable or unfavorable stakeholder response. Grounded in signaling theory, this meta-analysis integrates findings from 88 studies to clarify when and why CSA can be effective. We examine 501 effect sizes across the marketing, management, and public-relations disciplines to identify moderating conditions related to the signal, signaler, signal receiver, and signaling environment. Results show that CSA is most effective when it is more consistent, involves resource commitment, and supports (rather than opposes) a sociopolitical issue. It is also more effective when communicated by brands, targeted at investors, and situated in service industries, emerging economies, open and more free societies, and high-intensity advertising environments. CSA tends to generate positive financial, attitudinal, and behavioral responses, whereas its influence on social-media engagement and internal perceptions appears limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Braga, Luiza D. & Tardin, Matheus G. & Grinstein, Amir & Perin, Marcelo G., 2026. "Corporate sociopolitical activism as a Signal: A Meta-Analysis and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0148296326001815
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296326001815
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0148296326001815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.