IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v205y2026ics0148296325007271.html

Interpreting and reacting to followers’ proactive work behaviors: the role of leaders’ proactive implicit followership theories

Author

Listed:
  • Peng, Jian
  • Nie, Qi
  • Chen, Xiao

Abstract

How do leaders react to their followers’ proactive work behaviors? Drawing on follower categorization theory, this research proposes that leaders may interpret such behaviors either as benefits or as threats and, in turn, respond with support or undermining. We also identify leaders’ proactive implicit followership theories (IFTs) as key boundary conditions. After developing a measure of proactive IFTs through pilot studies, we tested our model using an experiment (Study 1) and a four-wave field survey (Study 2). Study 1 shows that when leaders hold higher (vs. lower) proactive IFTs, followers’ proactive work behaviors elicit perceived benefits (vs. threats). Study 2 replicates and extends these findings, demonstrating that perceived benefits (vs. threats) predict leaders’ social support (vs. undermining), which subsequently promotes (vs. reduces) followers’ proactive work behaviors. This research offers novel insights into the question of how to manage proactive work behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng, Jian & Nie, Qi & Chen, Xiao, 2026. "Interpreting and reacting to followers’ proactive work behaviors: the role of leaders’ proactive implicit followership theories," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325007271
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325007271
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325007271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.