IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v200y2025ics0148296325004023.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-affinity effects of cat and dog products and corporate social responsibility appeals (CSRAs)

Author

Listed:
  • Choi, Sunhee
  • Friske, Wesley
  • Dass, Mayukh

Abstract

With the growing number of pet owners in the marketplace, marketing academics and managers are becoming more interested in how pet owners make purchase decisions for themselves and their pets. Using scanner data of more than 23 million transactions across 875,853 unique baskets, this paper empirically examines the cross-category relationships between cat and dog product purchases and purchases of human products that have corporate social responsibility appeal (CSRA) messages on their packages. Our modeling approach is based on affinity analysis, which is a form of market basket analysis that allows us to examine the co-occurrence of items from separate product categories in a market basket. We hypothesize that the cross-affinity effects (i.e., cross-category dependencies) between pet products and CSRA products are influenced by the type of pet (i.e., cat versus dog). We find that the cross-affinities between pet products and functional CSRA products (i.e., organic and eco-friendly items) are stronger in cat-owner baskets, whereas the cross-affinities between pet products and symbolic CSRAs products (i.e., cause-related marketing, cruelty-free, and fair-trade items) are stronger in dog-owner baskets.Furthermore, the results suggest that anincrease in thesize of the market basket attenuates the cross-category affinities between cat and dog products and CSRA products.

Suggested Citation

  • Choi, Sunhee & Friske, Wesley & Dass, Mayukh, 2025. "Cross-affinity effects of cat and dog products and corporate social responsibility appeals (CSRAs)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325004023
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004023
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325004023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.