IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v200y2025ics0148296325004023.html

Cross-affinity effects of cat and dog products and corporate social responsibility appeals (CSRAs)

Author

Listed:
  • Choi, Sunhee
  • Friske, Wesley
  • Dass, Mayukh

Abstract

With the growing number of pet owners in the marketplace, marketing academics and managers are becoming more interested in how pet owners make purchase decisions for themselves and their pets. Using scanner data of more than 23 million transactions across 875,853 unique baskets, this paper empirically examines the cross-category relationships between cat and dog product purchases and purchases of human products that have corporate social responsibility appeal (CSRA) messages on their packages. Our modeling approach is based on affinity analysis, which is a form of market basket analysis that allows us to examine the co-occurrence of items from separate product categories in a market basket. We hypothesize that the cross-affinity effects (i.e., cross-category dependencies) between pet products and CSRA products are influenced by the type of pet (i.e., cat versus dog). We find that the cross-affinities between pet products and functional CSRA products (i.e., organic and eco-friendly items) are stronger in cat-owner baskets, whereas the cross-affinities between pet products and symbolic CSRAs products (i.e., cause-related marketing, cruelty-free, and fair-trade items) are stronger in dog-owner baskets.Furthermore, the results suggest that anincrease in thesize of the market basket attenuates the cross-category affinities between cat and dog products and CSRA products.

Suggested Citation

  • Choi, Sunhee & Friske, Wesley & Dass, Mayukh, 2025. "Cross-affinity effects of cat and dog products and corporate social responsibility appeals (CSRAs)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325004023
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004023
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lancendorfer, Karen M. & Atkin, JoAnn L. & Reece, Bonnie B., 2008. "Animals in advertising: Love dogs? Love the ad!," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 384-391, May.
    2. Maille, Virginie & Hoffmann, Jonas, 2013. "Compliance with veterinary prescriptions: The role of physical and social risk revisited," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 141-144.
    3. Paulo Albuquerque & Bart J. Bronnenberg, 2012. "Measuring the Impact of Negative Demand Shocks on Car Dealer Networks," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 4-23, January.
    4. Rui (Juliet) Zhu & Joan Meyers-Levy, 2007. "Exploring the Cognitive Mechanism that Underlies Regulatory Focus Effects," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(1), pages 89-96, April.
    5. Nicholas Epley, 2018. "A Mind like Mine: The Exceptionally Ordinary Underpinnings of Anthropomorphism," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(4), pages 591-598.
    6. Sigurdsson, Valdimar & Larsen, Nils Magne & Pálsdóttir, Rakel Gyða & Folwarczny, Michal & Menon, R.G. Vishnu & Fagerstrøm, Asle, 2022. "Increasing the effectiveness of ecological food signaling: Comparing sustainability tags with eco-labels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1099-1110.
    7. James A. Mourey & Jenny G. Olson & Carolyn Yoon, 2017. "Products as Pals: Engaging with Anthropomorphic Products Mitigates the Effects of Social Exclusion," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(2), pages 414-431.
    8. Arnold, Mark J. & Reynolds, Kristy E., 2009. "Affect and Retail Shopping Behavior: Understanding the Role of Mood Regulation and Regulatory Focus," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 308-320.
    9. Cavanaugh, Lisa A. & Leonard, Hillary A. & Scammon, Debra L., 2008. "A tail of two personalities: How canine companions shape relationships and well-being," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 469-479, May.
    10. Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2001. "Endogeneity and Heterogeneity in a Probit Demand Model: Estimation Using Aggregate Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 442-456, December.
    11. Choi, Sunhee & Duhan, Dale F. & Dass, Mayukh, 2023. "The influence of corporate social responsibility appeals (CSRAs) on product sales: Which appeal types perform better?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 115-135.
    12. K. Sudhir & Vrinda Kadiyali & Vithala R. Rao, 2001. "Structural Analysis of Manufacturer Pricing in the Presence of a Strategic Retailer," Yale School of Management Working Papers ysm229, Yale School of Management.
    13. Schwarz Peter M & Troyer Jennifer L & Walker Jennifer Beck, 2007. "Animal House: Economics of Pets and the Household," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, July.
    14. Van Doorn, Jenny & Verhoef, Peter C., 2015. "Drivers of and Barriers to Organic Purchase Behavior," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 436-450.
    15. Erica Herpen & Erjen Nierop & Laurens Sloot, 2012. "The relationship between in-store marketing and observed sales for organic versus fair trade products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 293-308, March.
    16. David R. Bell & James M. Lattin, 1998. "Shopping Behavior and Consumer Preference for Store Price Format: Why “Large Basket” Shoppers Prefer EDLP," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 66-88.
    17. Ridgway, Nancy M. & Kukar-Kinney, Monika & Monroe, Kent B. & Chamberlin, Emily, 2008. "Does excessive buying for self relate to spending on pets?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 392-396, May.
    18. Kirk, Colleen P., 2019. "Dogs have masters, cats have staff: Consumers' psychological ownership and their economic valuation of pets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 306-318.
    19. Kennedy, Patricia F. & McGarvey, Mary G., 2008. "Animal-companion depictions in women's magazine advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 424-430, May.
    20. K. Sudhir, 2001. "Structural Analysis of Manufacturer Pricing in the Presence of a Strategic Retailer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 244-264, October.
    21. Liu, Yahui & Chang, Xinyu & Yang, Shuai & Li, Zhen & Wu, Yingrong, 2024. "“Pets make you spend more!” Impact of pet ownership on consumer purchase decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    22. Wagner Kamakura, 2012. "Sequential market basket analysis," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 505-516, September.
    23. N. Gromek & J. Perek-Białas, 2022. "Why is pet goods consumption imperceptible for economists? A scoping review," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(11), pages 1-25, November.
    24. Apaolaza, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick & Paredes, Mario R. & Trujillo, Alejandra & D'Souza, Clare, 2022. "What motivates consumers to buy fashion pet clothing? The role of attachment, pet anthropomorphism, and self-expansion," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 367-379.
    25. Henri Kuokkanen & William Sun, 2020. "Companies, Meet Ethical Consumers: Strategic CSR Management to Impact Consumer Choice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 403-423, October.
    26. Janette Young & Rhianna Pritchard & Carmel Nottle & Helen Banwell, 2020. "Pets, touch, and COVID-19: health benefits from non-human touch through times of stress," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 4(S2), pages 25-33, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirk, Colleen P., 2019. "Dogs have masters, cats have staff: Consumers' psychological ownership and their economic valuation of pets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 306-318.
    2. Liu, Yahui & Chang, Xinyu & Yang, Shuai & Li, Zhen & Wu, Yingrong, 2024. "“Pets make you spend more!” Impact of pet ownership on consumer purchase decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Richards, Timothy J. & Hamilton, Stephen F. & Yonezawa, Koichi, 2018. "Retail Market Power in a Shopping Basket Model of Supermarket Competition," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 328-342.
    4. Steven M. Shugan, 2005. "Comments on Competitive Responsiveness," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 3-7.
    5. Steven M. Shugan, 2002. "In Search of Data: An Editorial," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 369-377.
    6. Sofia Berto Villas-Boas, 2007. "Vertical Relationships between Manufacturers and Retailers: Inference with Limited Data," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 74(2), pages 625-652.
    7. Yonezawa, Koichi & Richards, Timothy J., 2016. "Competitive Package Size Decisions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(4), pages 445-469.
    8. Salma Karray, 2015. "Modeling brand advertising with heterogeneous consumer response: channel implications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 233(1), pages 181-199, October.
    9. N. Gromek & J. Perek-Białas, 2022. "Why is pet goods consumption imperceptible for economists? A scoping review," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(11), pages 1-25, November.
    10. Chen Zhou & Shrihari Sridhar & Rafael Becerril-Arreola & Tony Haitao Cui & Yan Dong, 2019. "Promotions as competitive reactions to recalls and their consequences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 702-722, July.
    11. Yang Li & Asim Ansari, 2014. "A Bayesian Semiparametric Approach for Endogeneity and Heterogeneity in Choice Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1161-1179, May.
    12. Choi, Sunhee & Duhan, Dale F. & Dass, Mayukh, 2023. "The influence of corporate social responsibility appeals (CSRAs) on product sales: Which appeal types perform better?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 115-135.
    13. Donna, Javier D. & Pereira, Pedro & Trindade, Andre & Yoshida, Renan C., 2020. "Direct-to-Consumer Sales by Manufacturers and Bargaining," MPRA Paper 105773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Karray, Salma & Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Zaccour, Georges, 2017. "Assessing the profitability of cooperative advertising programs in competing channels," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 142-158.
    15. Xiao, Tiaojun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E., 2014. "Product variety and channel structure strategy for a retailer-Stackelberg supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 114-124.
    16. Junhong Chu & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2009. "Quantifying the Economic Value of Warranties in the U.S. Server Market," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 99-121, 01-02.
    17. David Besanko & Jean-Pierre Dubé & Sachin Gupta, 2005. "Own-Brand and Cross-Brand Retail Pass-Through," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 123-137, July.
    18. Lin Chen & Li Zeng & Ting Dong & Qinzi Xiao & Congjun Rao & Zhongrui Wang, 2026. "Pricing strategies for dual-channel supply chain considering showrooming effect and channel power structures," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 1091-1140, April.
    19. Timothy Richards, 2007. "A nested logit model of strategic promotion," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 63-91, March.
    20. Chuan He & Johan Marklund & Thomas Vossen, 2008. "—Vertical Information Sharing in a Volatile Market," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 513-530, 05-06.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325004023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.