IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v199y2025ics0148296325003674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Endorsement effectiveness of celebrities’ avatars: Evidence from multiple experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Xue, Jin
  • Liu, Matthew Tingchi
  • Song, Xi

Abstract

Recent advances in artificial intelligence have permeated the adoption of avatars in marketing, prompting human celebrities to create virtual representations of themselves in the cyber environment or the Metaverse as an advertising strategy. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence that explicitly substantiates the efficacy of celebrities’ avatars in comparison to human beings and other virtual celebrities. Through five studies (comprising one eye-tracking analysis and four online experiments), we find that human celebrities and their avatars can be equally persuasive. Notably, the indirect effect between the endorser type and consumer attitude via perceived novelty is more pronounced when the psychological distance between the consumer and the human celebrity is distal, resulting in greater enjoyment of the advertisements. This research improves the understanding of avatar endorsement and underscores the competitive nature of avatars, which maintain marketing efficacy comparable to that of human celebrities while appealing to consumers through novelty attributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue, Jin & Liu, Matthew Tingchi & Song, Xi, 2025. "Endorsement effectiveness of celebrities’ avatars: Evidence from multiple experiments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325003674
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325003674
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115544?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325003674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.