IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v199y2025ics0148296325003558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Light and shadow dance together: How and when ambidextrous leadership enhances versus inhibits employee innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zhenyuan
  • Wang, Rongsong
  • Gu, Jun
  • Mitchell, Rebecca
  • Lai, Yujie

Abstract

Previous studies highlight the mediating role of workplace stress in the relationship between ambidextrous leadership and employee outcomes, but findings remain complex and inconsistent. To address this, we integrate the challenge-hindrance stressor framework with ambidextrous leadership theory, proposing that ambidextrous leadership influences innovative work behavior (IWB) both positively and negatively via perceived stressors. Drawing on the resource allocation framework, we also explore the curvilinear moderating effect of conscientiousness. Using a video vignette experiment and a three-wave survey in Chinese firms, our findings revealed that ambidextrous leadership increased both challenge and hindrance stressors, which, in turn, enhanced or diminished IWB, respectively. Furthermore, conscientiousness strengthened the positive relationship between challenge stressors and IWB up to a moderate level but weakened it at high levels, while amplifying the negative relationship between hindrance stressors and IWB. These findings advance understanding of the double-edged effect of ambidextrous leadership and the role of stress perceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Zhenyuan & Wang, Rongsong & Gu, Jun & Mitchell, Rebecca & Lai, Yujie, 2025. "Light and shadow dance together: How and when ambidextrous leadership enhances versus inhibits employee innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325003558
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325003558
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325003558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.