IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v199y2025ics014829632500339x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Walk in my shoes: Does perspective-taking enable better work design?

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Dizhen
  • Meng, Liang

Abstract

Despite the vast amount of research on work design, few studies directly examined work design as a behavior and/or explored the antecedents of “poor” work design. Across three studies, we found fundamental divergence in work design behaviors between individuals adopting the manager’s and the employee’s perspectives. Study 1 supported this major finding by showing that managers were less likely to assign enriching tasks to their employees when adopting the manager’s perspective. Study 2 further revealed that perspective-taking would reduce the discrepancy in work design behaviors between individuals adopting different perspectives, and help managers to design enriching work for their employees. Study 3 replicated these findings in real work settings, demonstrating that perspective-taking significantly enhances managers’ consideration of skill variety in work design. Taken together, this study contributes to the literature on work design antecedents and perspective-taking, and promotes sound work design in managerial practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Dizhen & Meng, Liang, 2025. "Walk in my shoes: Does perspective-taking enable better work design?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s014829632500339x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500339X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115516?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s014829632500339x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.