IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v197y2025ics014829632500284x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Video moves you: Randomized field experiment shows how in-app videos increase exercise

Author

Listed:
  • Riedl, Christoph
  • Pauwels, Koen

Abstract

Despite a booming market for mobile apps, many users abandon them after just one use, which poses challenges for apps that rely on subscription revenue models. Demonstration videos depicting successful behavior by other users may stimulate engagement by new users. Intuitively, such videos should be particularly beneficial to lower-skilled users who do not already know how to perform the behavior. We build on challenge vs. threat appraisal theory to investigate who benefits from demonstration videos and explain how user skill and task difficulty jointly affect engagement. We test our theory with a field experiment embedded in a health and fitness app that randomly blocked demonstration videos in 4.5 million user-exercise pairs. We find demonstration videos benefit users who are well-practiced at a given exercise difficult level, but backfire for those with lower skills. We theorize that lower-skilled users may benefit less from demonstration videos because videos reveal information about the task’s demands that they were unaware of, thus evoking a threat appraisal of the situation. Qualitative evidence collected from app users corroborates the challenge vs. threat appraisal mechanism. Our study contributes to the literature by showing how the design of digital platforms can encourage meaningful engagement and by explaining why providing more information to users can backfire.

Suggested Citation

  • Riedl, Christoph & Pauwels, Koen, 2025. "Video moves you: Randomized field experiment shows how in-app videos increase exercise," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:197:y:2025:i:c:s014829632500284x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500284X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:197:y:2025:i:c:s014829632500284x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.