IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jappol/v28y2009i3p251-261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on value relevance of mark-to-market values of energy contracts under EITF Issue No. 98-10

Author

Listed:
  • Eng, Li Li
  • Saudagaran, Shahrokh
  • Yoon, Sora

Abstract

This paper examines whether marked-to-market values of energy trading assets and liabilities of companies that enter into energy contracts are related to market value of equity. The Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ruled in November 2002 to ban the use of mark-to-market accounting for energy contracts out of concern that fair values can be easily inflated. We find that the excess of fair value over original value of energy trading assets and energy trading liabilities is not relevant for valuation. It may be inferred that fair values which are subject to management estimates and not verifiable are poor signals of worth and performance (Watts, R., 2003. Conservatism in accounting Part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons 17, 207-221).

Suggested Citation

  • Eng, Li Li & Saudagaran, Shahrokh & Yoon, Sora, 2009. "A note on value relevance of mark-to-market values of energy contracts under EITF Issue No. 98-10," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 251-261, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jappol:v:28:y:2009:i:3:p:251-261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278-4254(09)00022-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liao, Lin & Kang, Helen & Morris, Richard D. & Tang, Qingliang, 2013. "Information asymmetry of fair value accounting during the financial crisis," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 221-236.
    2. Liao, Lin & Yao, Daifei (Troy) & Kang, Helen & Morris, Richard D., 2020. "The impact of legal efficacy on value relevance of the three-level fair value measurement hierarchy," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Kohlbeck, Mark & Smith, Thomas & Valencia, Adrian, 2017. "Auditors and net transfers of Level 3 fair-valued financial instruments," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 27-39.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jappol:v:28:y:2009:i:3:p:251-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jaccpubpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.