IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/irlaec/v58y2019icp1-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A replication study worth replicating: A comment on Salmanowitz and Spamann

Author

Listed:
  • Hubbard, William H.J.

Abstract

In “Does the Supreme Court Really Not Apply Chevron When It Should?,” Natalie Salmanowitz and Holger Spamann provide an excellent example of what replication studies in law and economics can and should do. They follow in the footsteps of a highly cited study (Eskridge and Baer, 2008), illuminate its methodological limitations, and with a compelling research design, obtain distinctive results. Importantly, Salmanowitz and Spamann’s methodology is itself reproducible, and it suggests a template for researchers looking to replicate other studies or conduct original research on similar topics.

Suggested Citation

  • Hubbard, William H.J., 2019. "A replication study worth replicating: A comment on Salmanowitz and Spamann," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-2.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:58:y:2019:i:c:p:1-2
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2018.12.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144818818302886
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irle.2018.12.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salmanowitz, Natalie & Spamann, Holger, 2019. "Does the Supreme Court really not apply Chevron when it should?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 81-89.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chin, Jason & Zeiler, Kathryn, 2021. "Replicability in Empirical Legal Research," LawArXiv 2b5k4, Center for Open Science.
    2. Heise, Michael, 2020. "Beyond replication: A few comments on Spruk and Kovac and Martin-Quinn scores," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:58:y:2019:i:c:p:1-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/irle .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.