IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ireced/v49y2025ics147738802500009x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does nudging higher education students improve attendance and does it matter? A quasi-natural experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Cortinhas, Carlos

Abstract

The effects of student absenteeism on educational outcomes are well documented, with most studies showing a significant, negative effect on student performance. In recent years, a growing number of institutions have been using a variety of nudge interventions to help combat absenteeism, improve student performance, and reduce dropout rates. Although many studies report the success of many of these initiatives in terms of student performance and retention, others alert that nudging can also have significant negative effects on students. This paper examines the effectiveness of nudging undergraduate students to improve attendance and student performance in tutorial sessions. We conducted a quasi-natural experiment with more than 400 year two UK university students, randomly assigning them to either a treatment group receiving personalized email reminders after missing tutorials, or a control group without any nudging intervention. Our results show a large and significant positive effect of the nudging intervention on attendance rates. Furthermore, using a two-stage least squares estimation method, we established that improved tutorial attendance leads to better performance. Our findings advance the debate on the efficacy of nudges in higher education and offer some important insights for addressing student absenteeism at the university level.

Suggested Citation

  • Cortinhas, Carlos, 2025. "Does nudging higher education students improve attendance and does it matter? A quasi-natural experiment," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:49:y:2025:i:c:s147738802500009x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iree.2025.100317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147738802500009X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iree.2025.100317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:49:y:2025:i:c:s147738802500009x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-review-of-economics-education .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.