IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intman/v31y2025i5s1075425325000699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge governance in multinational firms: Subsidiary roles amid IPR differences

Author

Listed:
  • Andrews, Daniel S.
  • Wolfesberger, Michael H.
  • Tinhof, Laurenz
  • Gaur, Ajai

Abstract

This study examines how multinational firms manage decision delegation in foreign subsidiaries amid varying intellectual property rights (IPR) protection. Analyzing data from 401 subsidiaries, we find that the relationship between institutional IPR differences and decision delegation is mediated by subsidiary strategic roles. In environments with weaker IPR protection, corporate parents position subsidiaries toward competence-exploiting roles, emphasizing non-local engagement and internal reliance on supplies. Conversely, in stronger IPR environments, subsidiaries adopt competence-creating roles with greater local knowledge engagement and external supply inflows. These strategic roles subsequently influence decision structures, with competence-creating roles requiring more autonomy and competence-exploiting roles facilitating centralization. This environment-strategy-structure alignment advances theory of how multinational firms design their organization to balance knowledge protection and creation globally.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrews, Daniel S. & Wolfesberger, Michael H. & Tinhof, Laurenz & Gaur, Ajai, 2025. "Knowledge governance in multinational firms: Subsidiary roles amid IPR differences," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intman:v:31:y:2025:i:5:s1075425325000699
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2025.101291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425325000699
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intman.2025.101291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intman:v:31:y:2025:i:5:s1075425325000699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/601266/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.