IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v91y2022ics0160289622000083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategy use moderates the relation between working memory capacity and fluid intelligence: A combined approach

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Chenyu
  • Ren, Xuezhu
  • Schweizer, Karl
  • Wang, Tengfei

Abstract

This study investigated whether the strength of the link between working memory capacity and fluid intelligence differs as people use different strategies to solve fluid intelligence problems. A sample of 214 university students completed three complex span tasks measuring working memory capacity and Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM) assessing fluid intelligence. Strategic behavior was measured by both the strategy questionnaire and the eye-tracking technique. Latent profile analysis yielded three groups of participants using constructive matching, response elimination, and a third strategy, respectively. Participants adopting constructive matching spent proportionally more time on the matrix area but less time on the response bank, and exhibited longer latency to first toggle and higher rate of toggling than those using response elimination and the other strategy, consistent with the results obtained from the questionnaire data. Furthermore, strategy use moderated the relationship between working memory capacity and APM performance. The link between working memory capacity and APM scores was significantly higher for participants using eliminative strategies including response elimination (r = 0.63) and the other strategy (r = 0.54) than that for those using constructive matching (r = 0.27). Our findings suggest that the extent to which working memory relates to performance on APM varies as a function of strategy use.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Chenyu & Ren, Xuezhu & Schweizer, Karl & Wang, Tengfei, 2022. "Strategy use moderates the relation between working memory capacity and fluid intelligence: A combined approach," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:91:y:2022:i:c:s0160289622000083
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2022.101627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289622000083
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2022.101627?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jarosz, Andrew F. & Raden, Megan J. & Wiley, Jennifer, 2019. "Working memory capacity and strategy use on the RAPM," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Jastrzębski, Jan & Ciechanowska, Iwona & Chuderski, Adam, 2018. "The strong link between fluid intelligence and working memory cannot be explained away by strategy use," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 44-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Yaohui & Zhan, Peida & Fu, Yanbin & Chen, Qipeng & Man, Kaiwen & Luo, Yikun, 2023. "Using a multi-strategy eye-tracking psychometric model to measure intelligence and identify cognitive strategy in Raven's advanced progressive matrices," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Yaohui & Zhan, Peida & Fu, Yanbin & Chen, Qipeng & Man, Kaiwen & Luo, Yikun, 2023. "Using a multi-strategy eye-tracking psychometric model to measure intelligence and identify cognitive strategy in Raven's advanced progressive matrices," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Raden, Megan J. & Jarosz, Andrew F., 2022. "Strategy Transfer on Fluid Reasoning Tasks," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Jarosz, Andrew F. & Raden, Megan J. & Wiley, Jennifer, 2019. "Working memory capacity and strategy use on the RAPM," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Jastrzębski, Jan & Ociepka, Michał & Chuderski, Adam, 2020. "Fluid reasoning is equivalent to relation processing," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Forthmann, Boris & Jendryczko, David & Scharfen, Jana & Kleinkorres, Ruben & Benedek, Mathias & Holling, Heinz, 2019. "Creative ideation, broad retrieval ability, and processing speed: A confirmatory study of nested cognitive abilities," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 59-72.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:91:y:2022:i:c:s0160289622000083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.