IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v86y2021ics0160289621000258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No evidence for an effect of a working memory training program on white matter microstructure

Author

Listed:
  • Lawlor-Savage, Linette
  • Kusi, Mavis
  • Clark, Cameron M.
  • Goghari, Vina M.

Abstract

Numerous studies demonstrate that working memory training benefits cognitive performance; however, such findings are controversial and the field is polarized. Despite a multitude of behavioural studies, investigation into the neurobiological mechanisms underlying working memory training remains limited. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) allows for the visualization of white matter structure and is a promising approach to identify neurobiological change associated with working memory training. In this study, 25 healthy community dwelling adults (age 18–40 years) underwent neuroimaging before and after completing a 6-week home- and web-based complex working memory training program. An active control group (n = 24) completed 6-weeks of processing speed training using the same computerized platform and imaging protocol. Voxel-wise statistical analysis of the DTI data was conducted with FSL's Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) to assess change in several metrics over the course of the intervention. Additionally, averaged whole-brain values (i.e., throughout all cerebral white matter) for each DTI metric were examined via one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The participants' scores on the training tasks significantly improved post-training. The training was not associated with improved scores on non-trained cognitive measures. The working memory training also did not alter regional or global white matter microstructure, as measured by fractional anisotrophy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD). Consistent with our previous published findings on brain activity and grey matter structure in the same study sample, the present study does not suggest that home- and web-based complex working memory training alters white matter microstructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawlor-Savage, Linette & Kusi, Mavis & Clark, Cameron M. & Goghari, Vina M., 2021. "No evidence for an effect of a working memory training program on white matter microstructure," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:86:y:2021:i:c:s0160289621000258
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2021.101541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289621000258
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101541?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clark, Cameron M. & Lawlor-Savage, Linette & Goghari, Vina M., 2017. "Comparing brain activations associated with working memory and fluid intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 66-77.
    2. Sala, Giovanni & Aksayli, N. Deniz & Tatlidil, K. Semir & Gondo, Yasuyuki & Gobet, Fernand, 2019. "Working memory training does not enhance older adults' cognitive skills: A comprehensive meta-analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Cameron M Clark & Linette Lawlor-Savage & Vina M Goghari, 2017. "Working memory training in healthy young adults: Support for the null from a randomized comparison to active and passive control groups," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-25, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clark, Cameron M. & Lawlor-Savage, Linette & Goghari, Vina M., 2017. "Comparing brain activations associated with working memory and fluid intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 66-77.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:86:y:2021:i:c:s0160289621000258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.