IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v115y2026ics0160289625000935.html

Heterogeneous relationships between working speed and ability on the Reasoning and Intelligence Online Test (RIOT)

Author

Listed:
  • Warne, Russell T.

Abstract

Mental speed is a multidimensional construct that encompasses three distinct time-related measures: reaction time, processing speed, and tempo, the latter of which is defined as the rate at which individuals respond to items varying in difficulty. This study jointly analyzes item responses and response times from 1467 adults taking the nine core subtests of the Reasoning and Intelligence Online Test (RIOT; https://riotiq.com). Using a joint hierarchical model of responses and response times, results indicated good model fit across subtests, with weak correlations between examinee ability and examinee tempo for verbal tasks (r = −0.208 to 0.317) and stronger negative correlations for visuospatial tasks (r = −0.504 to −0.774), supporting predictions from dual process theory. Item intensity positively correlated with response times with difficulty on most subtests, indicating that item characteristics were the cause of longer response times for more difficult items. Few examinees (2.5 %) exhibited dual misfit in responses and times, but the Figure Weights subtest revealed anomalous slow responding. Findings are consistent with tempo (i.e., examinee response times) being largely independent of cognitive ability, with observed correlations influenced by item characteristics. Implications for intelligence testing and future experimental validation are discussed. A preprint of this article is available at https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/c82b7.

Suggested Citation

  • Warne, Russell T., 2026. "Heterogeneous relationships between working speed and ability on the Reasoning and Intelligence Online Test (RIOT)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:115:y:2026:i:c:s0160289625000935
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2025.101990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289625000935
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2025.101990?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:115:y:2026:i:c:s0160289625000935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.