Author
Listed:
- Acharya, Vrinda
- Acharya K, Aneesha
- Gil, Mathew Thomas
Abstract
This study examines the effects of doctoral program demands and resources on the burnout experienced by doctoral students across different types of universities and program stages, using the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) model. Data were obtained from 391 full-time doctoral students enrolled in various universities across India. Using multiple linear regression with a dummy variable model, the study evaluated the associations between program demands, available resources, and student burnout across four types of universities (central universities, state universities, private universities, and deemed-to-be universities) and at different stages of doctoral education (enrolment, registration, synopsis submission, thesis submission, viva-voce examination). The findings extend the application of the JD-R model to doctoral education and provide a systematic comparison of burnout patterns across types of universities and program stages. The results indicate a positive association between program demands and burnout and a negative association between resources and burnout. Private universities exhibited the highest program demands and burnout levels, followed by state and central universities. Central universities offer a higher level of program resources than other universities do. Similarly, burnout was more evident in advanced stages of the doctoral journey, especially during the synopsis and viva voce phases. Additionally, doctoral students who are married and who stay with their children tend to experience a higher level of burnout. University administrators and supervisors are encouraged to implement flexible program structures, enhance the quality of mentorship, and strengthen psychosocial support systems tailored to specific university and program stages to mitigate burnout among students.
Suggested Citation
Acharya, Vrinda & Acharya K, Aneesha & Gil, Mathew Thomas, 2026.
"Understanding burnout in doctoral education: A Job Demands–Resources model perspective across types of university and program stages,"
International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:injoed:v:123:y:2026:i:c:s0738059326000982
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2026.103588
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:injoed:v:123:y:2026:i:c:s0738059326000982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-educational-development .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.