IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/indorg/v104y2026ics0167718725001055.html

Supply chain disruption and precautionary industrial policy

Author

Listed:
  • Motta, Massimo
  • Polo, Michele

Abstract

The paper analyzes the design of industrial policies to improve the efficiency of a local input when there is a risk of international supply chain disruption. We first establish a case for research subsidies in a monopolistic setting: private investment to improve the inferior technology is lower than the socially optimal one. Then, considering several market environments differing in size, structure and appropriability of the innovation, we analyze private and welfare-maximizing investments and optimal transfers. Subsidies are always optimal with both monopolies and research joint-ventures, whereas under some circumstamces (notably, when there is high appropriability of an innovation and investment costs are sufficiently low) a tax might be optimal under duopoly. Research joint-ventures in an integrated market or a public reseach lab socially outperform the other environments since they benefit from a larger integrated market and a wider circulation of the innovation while preserving competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Motta, Massimo & Polo, Michele, 2026. "Supply chain disruption and precautionary industrial policy," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:indorg:v:104:y:2026:i:c:s0167718725001055
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2025.103239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167718725001055
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2025.103239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. d'Aspremont, Claude & Jacquemin, Alexis, 1990. "Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers: Erratum," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(3), pages 641-642, June.
    2. Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman & Alejandro Sabal, 2023. "Resilience in Vertical Supply Chains," Working Papers 2023-03, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    3. Philippe Aghion & Nick Bloom & Richard Blundell & Rachel Griffith & Peter Howitt, 2005. "Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 120(2), pages 701-728.
    4. Philippe Aghion & Ketan Ahuja & Chad P. Bown & Uwe Cantner & Chiara Criscuolo & Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Mathias Dewatripont & Ricardo Hausmann & Guy Lalanne & Ben McWilliams & Dani Rodrik & Simone Ta, . "Sparking Europe’s new industrial revolution- A policy for net zero, growth and resilience," Bruegel Book, Bruegel, number node_9216, January.
    5. Federico, Giulio & Langus, Gregor & Valletti, Tommaso, 2018. "Reprint of: Horizontal mergers and product innovation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 590-612.
    6. Fabra, Natalia & Motta, Massimo & Peitz, Martin, 2022. "Learning from electricity markets: How to design a resilience strategy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Federico, Giulio & Langus, Gregor & Valletti, Tommaso, 2018. "Horizontal mergers and product innovation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-23.
    8. Fabra, Natalia, 2018. "A primer on capacity mechanisms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 323-335.
    9. Matthew Elliott & Benjamin Golub & Matthew V. Leduc, 2022. "Supply Network Formation and Fragility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(8), pages 2701-2747, August.
    10. Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman & Hugo Lhuillier, 2023. "Supply Chain Resilience: Should Policy Promote International Diversification or Reshoring?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 131(12), pages 3462-3496.
    11. Motta, Massimo & Tarantino, Emanuele, 2021. "The effect of horizontal mergers, when firms compete in prices and investments," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Joanna Piechucka & Lluis Sauri-Romero & Ben Smulders, 2024. "Competition and Industrial Policies: Complementary Action for EU Competitiveness," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 384-408.
    13. Stephie Fried & David Lagakos, 2023. "Electricity and Firm Productivity: A General-Equilibrium Approach," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 67-103, October.
    14. Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman & Alejandro Sabal, 2023. "Resilience in Vertical Supply Chains," NBER Working Papers 31739, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Marc Bourreau & Bruno Jullien & Yassine Lefouili, 2026. "Horizontal Mergers and Incremental Innovation," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 57(1), pages 122-139, March.
    16. Traiberman, Sharon & Rotemberg, Martin, 2023. "Precautionary protectionism," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    17. Cyrille Schwellnus & Antton Haramboure & Lea Samek & Ricardo Chiapin Pechansky & Charles Cadestin, 2023. "Global value chain dependencies under the magnifying glass," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 142, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lefouili, Yassine & Madio, Leonardo, 2026. "Mergers and investments: Where do we stand?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Haucap, Justus & Rasch, Alexander & Stiebale, Joel, 2019. "How mergers affect innovation: Theory and evidence," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 283-325.
    3. repec:tin:wpaper:20210063 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Tommaso Valletti & Hans Zenger, 2021. "Mergers with Differentiated Products: Where Do We Stand?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 58(1), pages 179-212, February.
    5. Haucap, Justus & Stiebale, Joel, 2023. "Non-price effects of mergers and acquisitions," DICE Discussion Papers 402, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    6. Brett Hollenbeck, 2020. "Horizontal mergers and innovation in concentrated industries," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-37, March.
    7. Laureen de Barsy & Axel Gautier, 2024. "Big Tech Acquisitions and Innovation: An Empirical Assessment," CESifo Working Paper Series 11025, CESifo.
    8. Cabolis, C. & Manasakis, C. & Moreno, D. & Petrakis, E., 2021. "The interactions of R&D investments and horizontal mergers," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 507-534.
    9. Igor Letina & Armin Schmutzler & Regina Seibel, 2024. "Killer Acquisitions And Beyond: Policy Effects On Innovation Strategies," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 65(2), pages 591-622, May.
    10. Bennato, Anna Rita & Davies, Stephen & Mariuzzo, Franco & Ormosi, Peter, 2021. "Mergers and innovation: Evidence from the hard disk drive market," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. José Luis Moraga‐González & Evgenia Motchenkova & Saish Nevrekar, 2022. "Mergers and innovation portfolios," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(4), pages 641-677, December.
    12. Calvano, Emilio & Polo, Michele, 2021. "Market power, competition and innovation in digital markets: A survey," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    13. Stadler Manfred & Unsorg Maximiliane, 2022. "Manager Delegation, Owner Coordination and Firms’ Investment in Automation," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 73(2), pages 159-182, August.
    14. Tomaso Duso & Martin Peitz, 2026. "Aligning Competition Policy and Industrial Policy in the EU ±," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-35, December.
    15. Brunner, Philipp & Letina, Igor & Schmutzler, Armin, 2024. "Research joint ventures: The role of financial constraints," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    16. Norbäck Pehr-Johan & Persson Lars & Olofsson Charlotta, 2020. "Acquisitions for Sleep," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, April.
    17. Øystein Foros & Bjørn Hansen & Thibaud Vergé, 2023. "Co-operative investment by downstream rivals: network sharing in telecom markets," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 34-47, December.
    18. Ramiro de Elejalde & Carlos Ponce & Flavia Roldán, 2018. "Innovation and competition: evidence from Uruguayan firms," Documentos de Investigación 116, Universidad ORT Uruguay. Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales.
    19. Marc Bourreau & Yutec Sun, 2022. "Competition and Quality: Evidence from the Entry of Mobile Network Service," Working Papers 22-04, NET Institute.
    20. Volker Nocke & Nicolas Schutz, 2025. "An Aggregative Games Approach to Merger Analysis in Multiproduct‐Firm Oligopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 56(3), pages 233-250, September.
    21. Motta, Massimo & Tarantino, Emanuele, 2021. "The effect of horizontal mergers, when firms compete in prices and investments," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L40 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - General
    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:indorg:v:104:y:2026:i:c:s0167718725001055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505551 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.