IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijrema/v42y2025i3p594-609.html

Rarity, the WTA-WTP disparity, and price adjustments in the NFT market

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Yuanyuan
  • Huangfu, Bingrui
  • Qiao, Zheng
  • Zhao, Xi

Abstract

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have become popular and are frequently traded in marketplaces. The current study examines how an NFT’s within-collection rarity influences sellers’ and buyers’ pricing and pricing dynamics. Relying on the pricing history of CryptoPunks, one of the most famous and valuable NFT collections, we find that rarity’s positive impact on willingness to accept is greater than on willingness to pay, which generates a larger pricing disparity. We further examine rarity’s impact on subsequent price adjustments and find that as rarity increases, buyers are more inclined to make greater price concessions, and sellers are reluctant to reduce their prices. Results also show that rarity’s positive impact on pricing is moderated by the NFT’s past ownership, agents’ trading experiences, and agents’ average holding periods for previous NFTs. Finally, an experiment reveals the mediating role of the focus on rarity that sellers tend to consider more about the NFT’s rarity than buyers, and therefore rarity’s positive impact on pricing is more salient for sellers than buyers.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Yuanyuan & Huangfu, Bingrui & Qiao, Zheng & Zhao, Xi, 2025. "Rarity, the WTA-WTP disparity, and price adjustments in the NFT market," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 594-609.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:42:y:2025:i:3:p:594-609
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.10.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811624000910
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.10.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yeonjoon Lee, 2022. "Measuring the impact of rarity on price: evidence from NBA Top Shot," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 485-498, September.
    2. Anderson, Cameron & Thompson, Leigh L., 2004. "Affect from the top down: How powerful individuals' positive affect shapes negotiations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 125-139, November.
    3. Haiyang Yang, 2024. "The Genesis Effect: Digital Goods in the Metaverse," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 51(1), pages 129-139.
    4. John A. List, 2011. "Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies? The Case of Exogenous Market Experience," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(3), pages 313-317, May.
    5. Rebecca Hamilton & Debora Thompson & Sterling Bone & Lan Nguyen Chaplin & Vladas Griskevicius & Kelly Goldsmith & Ronald Hill & Deborah Roedder John & Chiraag Mittal & Thomas O’Guinn & Paul Piff & Car, 2019. "The effects of scarcity on consumer decision journeys," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 532-550, May.
    6. Dowling, Michael, 2022. "Fertile LAND: Pricing non-fungible tokens," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    7. Jungkeun Kim, 2017. "The ownership distance effect: the impact of traces left by previous owners on the evaluation of used goods," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 591-605, December.
    8. Colicev, Anatoli, 2023. "How can non-fungible tokens bring value to brands," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 30-37.
    9. Rami Alkhudary & Bertrand Belvaux & Nathalie Guibert, 2023. "Understanding non-fungible tokens (NFTs): insights on consumption practices and a research agenda," Post-Print hal-04069880, HAL.
    10. Pinkley, Robin L. & Neale, Margaret A. & Bennett, Rebecca J., 1994. "The Impact of Alternatives to Settlement in Dyadic Negotiation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 97-116, January.
    11. Kentaro Asai & Seda Ertac & Ali Hortacsu & John List & Howard Nusbaum & Lester Tong & Karen Ye, 2016. "Trading experience modulates anterior insula to reduce the endowment effect," Framed Field Experiments 00717, The Field Experiments Website.
    12. Reto Hofstetter & Emanuel Bellis & Leif Brandes & Melanie Clegg & Cait Lamberton & David Reibstein & Felicia Rohlfsen & Bernd Schmitt & John Z. Zhang, 2022. "Crypto-marketing: how non-fungible tokens (NFTs) challenge traditional marketing," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 705-711, December.
    13. Mandel, David R., 2002. "Beyond mere ownership: transaction demand as a moderator of the endowment effect," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 737-747, July.
    14. Amin Mekacher & Alberto Bracci & Matthieu Nadini & Mauro Martino & Laura Alessandretti & Luca Maria Aiello & Andrea Baronchelli, 2022. "Heterogeneous rarity patterns drive price dynamics in NFT collections," Papers 2204.10243, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    15. Matthew Backus & Thomas Blakee & Brad Larsen & Steven Tadelis, 2020. "Sequential Bargaining in the Field: Evidence from Millions of Online Bargaining Interactions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(3), pages 1319-1361.
    16. Lynn, Michael, 1989. "Scarcity effects on desirability: Mediated by assumed expensiveness?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 257-274, June.
    17. Koford, Kenneth & Tschoegl, Adrian E., 1998. "The market value of rarity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 445-457, March.
    18. Zhang, Z. John, 2023. "Cryptopricing: Whence comes the value for cryptocurrencies and NFTs?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 22-29.
    19. Rami Alkhudary & Bertrand Belvaux & Nathalie Guibert, 2023. "Understanding non-fungible tokens (NFTs): insights on consumption practices and a research agenda," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 321-336, June.
    20. Dhananjay Nayakankuppam & Himanshu Mishra, 2005. "The Endowment Effect: Rose-Tinted and Dark-Tinted Glasses," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(3), pages 390-395, December.
    21. Caglar Irmak & Cheryl J. Wakslak & Yaacov Trope, 2013. "Selling the Forest, Buying the Trees: The Effect of Construal Level on Seller-Buyer Price Discrepancy," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(2), pages 284-297.
    22. Botond Kőszegi & Matthew Rabin, 2006. "A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(4), pages 1133-1165.
    23. John A. List, 2003. "Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 41-71.
    24. Carmon, Ziv & Ariely, Dan, 2000. "Focusing on the Forgone: How Value Can Appear So Different to Buyers and Sellers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(3), pages 360-370, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vomberg, Arnd & von Gegerfelt, Mats, 2025. "Unveiling investment vs. ownership perspectives among NFT buyers: A segmentation study exploring engagement patterns in NFT markets," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 536-556.
    2. Brandes, Leif & Dölp, Katharina, 2025. "Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) as digital brand extensions: Evidence on financial performance and parent-brand spillovers," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 491-521.
    3. Kim, Jungkeun & Cho, Areum & Lee, Daniel Chaein & Park, Jooyoung & Kim, Aekyoung & Jhang, Jihoon & Kim, Changju, 2025. "Consumer preferences for the visual presentation of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) of luxury products: the role of perceived authenticity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126230, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Kim, Jungkeun & Cho, Areum & Lee, Daniel Chaein & Park, Jooyoung & Kim, Aekyoung & Jhang, Jihoon & Kim, Changju, 2025. "Consumer preferences for the visual presentation of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) of luxury products: The role of perceived authenticity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Christina McGranaghan & Steven G. Otto, 2022. "Choice uncertainty and the endowment effect," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 83-104, August.
    6. Tontrup, Stephan, 2019. "Trading and Attentional Focus – Why we may overestimate the Impact of the Endowment Effect," EconStor Preprints 335549, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    7. Muneer M. Alshater & Nohade Nasrallah & Rim Khoury & Mayank Joshipura, 2025. "Deciphering the world of NFTs: a scholarly review of trends, challenges, and opportunities," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 4193-4249, October.
    8. Peter Landry, 2019. "Sunk ‘Decision Points’: a theory of the endowment effect and present bias," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 23-39, February.
    9. Giulia Nevi & Olivier Nicolas & Luca Dezi & Gian Luca Gregori, 2026. "To be or to want to be: how followers engage with NFTs, their communities and how it influences their identity journey," Post-Print hal-05577144, HAL.
    10. Yuval Arbel & Danny Ben-Shahar & Stuart Gabriel, 2016. "Are The Disabled Less Loss Averse? Evidence From A Natural Policy Experiment," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(2), pages 1291-1318, April.
    11. Yuqing Song, 2026. "The art of the gift: provenance and the endowment effect in Chinese gift artworks," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 50(1), pages 129-158, March.
    12. Massi, Marta & Vocino, Andrea & Piancatelli, Chiara & Cillo, Paola & Pellicelli, Anna Claudia, 2026. "Revolutionizing consumption: Unveiling the Allure of NFTs and digital twins for sustainable luxury fashion," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    13. Ebo Botchway & Jan Verpooten & Ine van der Beken & Justina Baršytė & Siegfried Dewitte, 2023. "The Endowment Effect in the Circular Economy: Do Broken Products Face Less of a Trading Barrier Than Intact or Repaired Ones?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Simon Gächter & Eric J. Johnson & Andreas Herrmann, 2022. "Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 599-624, April.
    15. Hyokjin Kwak & Marina Puzakova & Ann L. McGill & Junhee Kim, 2025. "When previous relationships limit the new: The interplay between product anthropomorphism and used products," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(5), pages 1335-1355, September.
    16. John List, 2020. "Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem," Natural Field Experiments 00687, The Field Experiments Website.
    17. Daniel Villanova, 2019. "The extended self, product valuation, and the endowment effect," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 357-371, December.
    18. Keith M. Marzilli Ericson & Andreas Fuster, 2014. "The Endowment Effect," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 6(1), pages 555-579, August.
    19. Lee, Crystal T. & Shen, Yung-Cheng, 2024. "Exploring determinants of non-fungible token creators’ engagement behaviors on metaverse-based NFT platforms: A multi-analytical SEM-IPMA method," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    20. Li, Wenjie & Corral de Zubielqui, Graciela & Rao Hill, Sally, 2025. "Unlocking the potential of NFTs in branding: An exploration of NFT-based brand experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:42:y:2025:i:3:p:594-609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-research-in-marketing/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.