IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijrema/v42y2025i2p316-334.html

Physical appearance improvements increase prosocial behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Kononov, Natalia
  • Ein-Gar, Danit
  • Puntoni, Stefano

Abstract

Consumers are increasingly focusing on enhancing their beauty, a global trend significantly driven by the pervasive influence of social media. The substantial investments of both money and time into personal appearance improvement raises questions about the broader societal effects of such behavior. This study explores whether improvements in individuals’ beautifying physical appearance can influence their behavior in areas unrelated to beauty, particularly in regard to prosocial consumer behavior. Across seven studies, including a field experiment, we find that engaging in physical appearance improvement, either actual or digital, increases public self-awareness among consumers. This heightened awareness leads to more frequent prosocial actions, such as charitable donations and ethical purchasing decisions. Furthermore, our research suggests that this inclination towards prosocial behavior becomes more pronounced with improvements in appearance that are noticeable to others. Recognizing physical improvement as a catalyst for prosociality holds significant implications for nonprofit organizations, offering opportunities to craft more effective appeals and optimize advertising strategies to foster prosocial behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Kononov, Natalia & Ein-Gar, Danit & Puntoni, Stefano, 2025. "Physical appearance improvements increase prosocial behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 316-334.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:42:y:2025:i:2:p:316-334
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.09.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811624000831
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.09.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katherine White & Rishad Habib & Darren W. Dahl, 2020. "A Review and Framework for Thinking about the Drivers of Prosocial Consumer Behavior," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(1), pages 2-18.
    2. Russell W. Belk, 2013. "Extended Self in a Digital World," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 477-500.
    3. Simon J Blanchard & Jacob Goldenberg & Koen Pauwels & David A Schweidel, 2022. "Promoting Data Richness in Consumer Research: How to Develop and Evaluate Articles with Multiple Data Sources [The Critical Role of Methodological Pluralism for Policy-Relevant Empirical Marketing Research]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(2), pages 359-372.
    4. Mathias Ekström, 2012. "Do watching eyes affect charitable giving? Evidence from a field experiment," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 15(3), pages 530-546, September.
    5. Joshua R. Polanin & Birte Snilstveit, 2016. "Converting between effect sizes," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13.
    6. Zhao, Xiaohong & Cai, Fengyan & Yang, Zhiyong, 2023. "Are people less generous after a family member gives to charity? The interaction of self-construal and relationship type," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 398-416.
    7. Wang, Xia & Tong, Luqiong, 2015. "Hide the light or let it shine? Examining the factors influencing the effect of publicizing donations on donors’ happiness," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 418-424.
    8. Wang, Yajin & John, Deborah Roedder & Griskevicious, Vladas, 2021. "Does the devil wear Prada? Luxury product experiences can affect prosocial behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 104-119.
    9. Adriana Samper & Linyun W Yang & Michelle E Daniels & Eileen FischerEditor & Leonard LeeAssociate Editor, 2018. "Beauty, Effort, and Misrepresentation: How Beauty Work Affects Judgments of Moral Character and Consumer Preferences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(1), pages 126-147.
    10. Xiaojing Yang & Xiaoyan Deng & Amita Bhadauria, 2020. "Does Mere Exposure to Beauty-Related Words Promote Prosocial Behavior? Exploring the Mental Association between Beauty and Prosociality," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(1), pages 106-116.
    11. Jean-Pierre Dubé & Xueming Luo & Zheng Fang, 2017. "Self-Signaling and Prosocial Behavior: A Cause Marketing Experiment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 140-156, March.
    12. Kessler, Judd B. & Meier, Stephan, 2014. "Learning from (failed) replications: Cognitive load manipulations and charitable giving," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 10-13.
    13. Malika Malika & Tanuka Ghoshal & Pragya Mathur & Durairaj Maheswaran, 2024. "Does scarcity increase or decrease donation behaviors? An investigation considering resource-specific scarcity and individual person-thing orientation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 426-448, March.
    14. Rosanna K Smith & Michelle R vanDellen & Lan Anh N Ton & Amna Kirmani & JoAndrea Hoegg, 2021. "Makeup Who You Are: Self-Expression Enhances the Perceived Authenticity and Public Promotion of Beauty Work," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(1), pages 102-122.
    15. Claudia Townsend & Darren DahlEditor & Page MoreauAssociate Editor, 2017. "The Price of Beauty: Differential Effects of Design Elements with and without Cost Implications in Nonprofit Donor Solicitations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 794-815.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perez, Dikla & Munichor, Nira & Buskila, Gadi, 2023. "Help yourself: Pictures of donation recipients engaged in physical self-help enhance donations on crowdfunding platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Freeman Wu & Martin Reimann & Gratiana Pol & C. Whan Park, 2023. "The scarcity of beauty: how and why product aesthetics mobilize consumer acquisition effort," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 1245-1265, November.
    3. Ho, Cony Ming-Shen & Chin, Shih-Chun (Daniel) & Wang, TzuShuo Ryan, 2025. "Recurring versus one-time donation requests: The toll on attracting donors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    4. Rachel E. Hochstein & Colleen M. Harmeling & Taylor Perko, 2025. "Toward a theory of consumer digital trust: Meta-analytic evidence of its role in the effectiveness of user-generated content," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 1034-1054, July.
    5. Lee, Hyunjung Crystal & De Vries, Eline L.E. & Hosseini, Rahil, 2025. "Balancing generosity with profitability: The role of relative market price and value perceptions in crypto philanthropy," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 668-683.
    6. Ma, Jingjing & Lin, Yu (Anna) & Ein-Gar, Danit, 2023. "Charitable maximizers: The impact of the maximizing mindset on donations to human recipients," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 417-434.
    7. Kumar, Jitender, 2024. "Psychological mechanisms behind access-based luxury brand consumption: Empirical investigation from the lens of new ownership paradigm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Preyas S. Desai & Jessie Liu, 2025. "Reactive Marketing and the Co-Production of (In)Authenticity," Papers 2511.16793, arXiv.org.
    9. K. Sudhir & Hortense Fong & Subroto Roy, 2014. "Greedy or Grateful" Asking for More when Thanking Donors," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2183, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    10. Vesely, Stepan & Klöckner, Christian A. & Carrus, Giuseppe & Chokrai, Parissa & Fritsche, Immo & Masson, Torsten & Panno, Angelo & Tiberio, Lorenza & Udall, Alina M., 2022. "Donations to renewable energy projects: The role of social norms and donor anonymity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. K. Sudhir & Hortense Fong & Subroto Roy, 2019. "Greedy or Grateful? Asking for More when Thanking Donors," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2183R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Mar 2021.
    12. Boegershausen, Johannes & Cornil, Yann & Yi, Shangwen & Hardisty, David J., 2025. "On the persistent mischaracterization of Google and Facebook A/B tests: How to conduct and report online platform studies," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 886-903.
    13. Nour El Houda Ben Amor & Mohamed Nabil Mzoughi, 2023. "Do Millennials’ Motives for Using Snapchat Influence the Effectiveness of Snap Ads?," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    14. Gary Bolton & Eugen Dimant & Ulrich Schmidt, 2018. "When a Nudge Backfires. Using Observation with Social and Economic Incentives to Promote Pro-Social Behavior," PPE Working Papers 0017, Philosophy, Politics and Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    15. Nguyen, Quynh N.X. & Thai, Nguyen T. & Heffernan, Troy W. & Reynolds, Nina & Zainuddin, Nadia, 2025. "A consumer wisdom-informed conceptualization for understanding prosocial behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    16. Takahashi, Ryo, 2021. "How to stimulate environmentally friendly consumption: Evidence from a nationwide social experiment in Japan to promote eco-friendly coffee," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    17. László SEER, 2020. "Toward A Threshold Model Of Consumer Autonomy For Human-Smart System Interactions: A Qualitative Study," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 15, pages 57-69, June.
    18. Lutz, Christoph & Newlands, Gemma, 2018. "Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 187-196.
    19. Ahmet Türkmen & Muhammed Bilgehan Aytaç, 2025. "The role of overt and covert narcissism in virtual goods purchase motivations and intention," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1545-1575, June.
    20. Ahn, Suhyoung & Ellie Jin, Byoungho & Seo, Hyesim, 2024. "Why do people interact and buy in the Metaverse? Self-Expansion perspectives and the impact of hedonic adaptation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:42:y:2025:i:2:p:316-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-research-in-marketing/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.