IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Smoking cessation should have more emphasis within Tobacco Control? The case for

Listed author(s):
  • Bolliger, C.T.
Registered author(s):

    Smoking cessation is usually mentioned last in the chain of established measures to improve Tobacco Control. This seems logical, as smoking cessation is a secondary or tertiary preventative measure only. In the recently proposed Tobacco Control Scale (TCS) using 6 Tobacco Control measures pricing is considered most important, and smoking cessation least important. For current smokers secondary or tertiary preventative measures are necessary with smoking cessation being the most effective one as its impact on health is immediate. Pricing, on the other hand, is less effective in inciting current smokers to quit. Further, the vast majority of smokers would like to quit if they were able; so help in achieving this goal is welcome. Other Tobacco Control measures, on the other hand, are mostly negatively perceived by smokers because they perceive them as curtailment of their freedom. This is a psychological advantage the health professional active in this area has over other people involved in Tobacco Control and must be exploited. There is also strong evidence that smoking cessation is cost-effective, especially when comparing costs involved in addressing other important health risk factors, such as hyperlipidemia and arterial hypertension. Finally, the role of smoking cessation in helping to decrease social acceptability of smoking should not be underrated as every smoker who quits sets an example for other smokers to follow or for children not to start. In summary, smoking cessation continues to be of paramount importance among Tobacco Control measures, and should get more emphasis especially in health care settings.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Health Policy.

    Volume (Year): 91 (2009)
    Issue (Month): Supplement 1 (July)
    Pages: 31-36

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:91:y:2009:i:supplement1:p:s31-s36
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:91:y:2009:i:supplement1:p:s31-s36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    or ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.