IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry views of biosimilar development in Japan


  • Horikawa, Hiroshi
  • Tsubouchi, Mina
  • Kawakami, Koji


Objective To understand the issues around biosimilar development by pharmaceutical companies in Japan, which has emerged as an urgent issue in guaranteeing the availability of affordable biopharmaceuticals and a reduction in drug costs.Methods Various regulatory guidelines related to biosimilar development are carefully reviewed. We then interviewed representatives of 11 Japanese companies to explore issues related to the manufacturing, immunogenicity, development costs and regulation of biosimilars.Results Our investigations show that Japan is unlikely to produce more than a handful of biosimilars domestically in the near future. We also found that regulatory guidelines for biosimilars will be needed for Japanese developers to plan and initiate production, in order to provide affordable biopharmaceuticals to Japanese patients.Conclusion These results represent that regulatory guidelines for biosimilars, encouraging competition with maintaining incentive for innovation, will be needed for Japanese developers to plan and initiate biosimilar development.

Suggested Citation

  • Horikawa, Hiroshi & Tsubouchi, Mina & Kawakami, Koji, 2009. "Industry views of biosimilar development in Japan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 189-194, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:91:y:2009:i:2:p:189-194

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. K. Bolin & B. Lindgren & P. Lundborg, 2008. "Informal and formal care among single-living elderly in Europe," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(3), pages 393-409.
    2. van Exel, Job & de Graaf, Gjalt & Brouwer, Werner, 2008. "Give me a break!: Informal caregiver attitudes towards respite care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 73-87, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:91:y:2009:i:2:p:189-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu) or (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.