IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v89y2009i3p295-302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medicine access and utilization in a population covered by primary health care in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Bertoldi, Andra Dmaso
  • de Barros, Alusio Jardim Dornellas
  • Wagner, Anita
  • Ross-Degnan, Dennis
  • Hallal, Pedro Curi

Abstract

Objectives To describe medicine utilization and access in a population covered by the Family Health Program (PSF) in Brazil.Methods Cross-sectional study with a random sample of 2988 individuals living in areas covered by 45 PSF clinics. Medicine utilization in the 15 days prior to the interview was assessed, as well as lack of access to medicines (proportion of people with medicines needed but not used), and lack of free access through the PSF (proportion of medicines used which had to be purchased).Results Overall, 54.5% (95% CI 50.6; 58.4) of individuals used at least one medicine in the 15-day period and 3.6% reported failing to use a needed medicine. Of all medicines used, 41.5% were paid for out-of-pocket (25.5% among the poorest families), and 51.0% were obtained for free from the PSF. Almost 90% of the medicines prescribed by PSF physicians were provided for free by the PSF.Conclusion Although medicine access was high, individuals paid out-of-pocket for a substantial proportion of the medicines used. Lack of availability in PSF facilities and prescribing by non-PSF providers seem to contribute to the need for out-of-pocket purchases, and thus can be targeted for improvement through PSF policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertoldi, Andra Dmaso & de Barros, Alusio Jardim Dornellas & Wagner, Anita & Ross-Degnan, Dennis & Hallal, Pedro Curi, 2009. "Medicine access and utilization in a population covered by primary health care in Brazil," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 295-302, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:89:y:2009:i:3:p:295-302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(08)00161-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:89:y:2009:i:3:p:295-302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.