IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v71y2005i3p289-301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating and planning ICUs: methods and approaches to differentiate between need and demand

Author

Listed:
  • Wild, Claudia
  • Narath, Markus

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Wild, Claudia & Narath, Markus, 2005. "Evaluating and planning ICUs: methods and approaches to differentiate between need and demand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 289-301, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:71:y:2005:i:3:p:289-301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(04)00116-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacques Grolier & Philippe Seguin & J.P. Bleichner & Y.M. Guillou & Y. Mall├ędan, 2002. "Effects of price information on test ordering in an intensive care unit," Post-Print halshs-00069673, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Livio Garattini & Michele Zanetti & Nicholas Freemantle, 2020. "The Italian NHS: What Lessons to Draw from COVID-19?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 463-466, August.
    2. Livio Garattini & Michele Zanetti & Nicholas Freemantle, 0. "The Italian NHS: What Lessons to Draw from COVID-19?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-4.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:71:y:2005:i:3:p:289-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.